Is GeForce FX5200 any better than GeForce2 MX/MX400

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmdir2005
  • Start date Start date
M

mmdir2005

My computer installed video card is GeForce2 MX400. My extra video
card is GeForce FX5200. Is FX5200 any better than MX400? I tried
both video cards. I don't see any
significant different. FX5200 is known to be little expensive than
MX400.
I don't know if anyway FX5200 any better than MX400.
 
My computer installed video card is GeForce2 MX400. My extra video
card is GeForce FX5200. Is FX5200 any better than MX400? I tried
both video cards. I don't see any
significant different. FX5200 is known to be little expensive than
MX400.
I don't know if anyway FX5200 any better than MX400.

I would hope the FX5200 is faster. If they are both AGP, maybe other
components are a bottleneck.

I was disappointed with the PCI version, but those hopes were probably
wishful thinking.

Good luck.
 
My computer installed video card is GeForce2 MX400. My extra video
card is GeForce FX5200. Is FX5200 any better than MX400? I tried
both video cards. I don't see any
significant different. FX5200 is known to be little expensive than
MX400.
I don't know if anyway FX5200 any better than MX400.


If the FX5200 has a 128bit memory bus, then it should be
faster, however problably not a huge difference. If it has only a
64bit bus, then you roblably won't notice much of a difference. The
only thing is the FX5200 supports DX9 pixel shaders, while the GF2
cards don't, but because the FX5200 is so weak, any games that use it
play very slow.
 
Back
Top