Is: 1.99 GB free of 11.4 GB a problem sign?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mart
  • Start date Start date
M

mart

Hi,

I have a Compaq Presario C700 Notebook PC -Vista Home Premium - SP 2, 32-bit
OS. Processor: Intel (R) Pentium (R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86 GHz 1.87 GHz
The memory (RAM) is 2.00 GB but suddenly is showing to be 1.99 GB

Is this normal because I'm running many windows (some with DVD) or is it a
sign of a problem? If it is than what can I do to fix this?

Anyone?

Thanks!
 
The memory (RAM) is 2.00 GB but suddenly is showing to be 1.99 GB

Huh ?? It is One and the same
 
Peter said:
Huh ?? It is One and the same
Click to expand...
Perhaps not quite the same, but not to worry for 0.01 GB, which is 10
kilobytes. That's close enough for all practical purposes.

Now back to worrying about health care...

Bill
 
je je.. thanks Bill!

Bill Sharpe said:
Perhaps not quite the same, but not to worry for 0.01 GB, which is 10
kilobytes. That's close enough for all practical purposes.

Now back to worrying about health care...

Bill
Click to expand...

je je.. thanks Bill!
 
Perhaps not quite the same, but not to worry for 0.01 GB, which is 10
kilobytes. That's close enough for all practical purposes.
Click to expand...

Or maybe 10 megabytes. Still close enough, as you said :-)
 
Gene said:
Or maybe 10 megabytes. Still close enough, as you said :-)
Click to expand...
Back in the old days when I used a slide rule I was able to estimate
where the decimal point or thousands separator should be in the answer.
Obviously I have lost the knack of properly doing that digitally with
tera, giga, mega, and kilo...

Bill
 
Back in the old days when I used a slide rule I was able to estimate where
the decimal point or thousands separator should be in the answer. Obviously I
have lost the knack of properly doing that digitally with tera, giga, mega,
and kilo...
Click to expand...
Bill
Click to expand...

When I first learned slide rule, there was a chapter or a page or
something that told you how to keep track of the decimal point. It had
rules like "If the slide sticks out to the left, move the decimal point
to the right (or was it left)". I never could keep it straight, even
back then. Too confusing.

So here's what I did: I did a rough calculation with pencil and paper
first. I'd get something like 1320.0 that way, whereas the slide rule
gave me a result like 156 (I told you it was rough!), so I knew the
answer was 1560. OTOH, if the slide rule gave me a number like 622, I
was pretty sure I'd screwed up, so the method served two purposes.

BTW, my error was almost always in the slide rule calculation :-)
 
Back
Top