You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
H
History Fan
N
NO--- LESBIAN
Instead of getting "Longhorn" RELEASED; they've decide to play elsewhere.
The Gates of hell are upon us--- again.
A
Art
Better ten years late than never? I doubt it. Far too many
have wised up and will never look to MS for security solutions.
I'd say it's ten years too late.
Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
N
NO--- LESBIAN
Better ten years late than never? I doubt it. Far too many
have wised up and will never look to MS for security solutions.
I'd say it's ten years too late.
Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
It is a guise to generate even more revenue when, in fact, "longhorn"
should have ALREADY been released.
D
David W. Hodgins
I thought their "new OS", with "heightened security built-in to guard against
would be hackers." was supposed take care of everything<g>.
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/761921
Regards, Dave Hodgins
M
Max Wachtel
I just received an invite to participate in the onecare beta. I'll let
you know how it goes.
-max
V
Virus Guy
So basically Micro$hit can't build a better OS, so instead they are
trying to sell a subscription-based solution to XP (a live mechanic
under every hood).
NT, Win2K, and XP were all designed for corporate desktops, gov't,
military, fortune-500 customers.
It's that pesky, insecure home PC market that Micro$hit can't really
provide a decent OS for. Historians will write about how M$ unleashed
the vulnerable and over-managed XP on the home market after weak
initial acceptance in the corporate world. 4 (or 5?) years later the
intellectual brain trust in Redmond has gone dry (what, they can't
come up with a new desktop motif and slap a new name on it?). Or do
they need a 10 ghz Pentium to be able to run the current bloat-ware
they have in the works?
Win-98 never needed an umbilical cord hooked up to the mothership like
XP obviously needs. I guess that's what it takes to keep XP from
eating itself up as it chugs along on the average home computer,
spewing spam right under the nose of the average idiot owner.
trying to sell a subscription-based solution to XP (a live mechanic
under every hood).
NT, Win2K, and XP were all designed for corporate desktops, gov't,
military, fortune-500 customers.
It's that pesky, insecure home PC market that Micro$hit can't really
provide a decent OS for. Historians will write about how M$ unleashed
the vulnerable and over-managed XP on the home market after weak
initial acceptance in the corporate world. 4 (or 5?) years later the
intellectual brain trust in Redmond has gone dry (what, they can't
come up with a new desktop motif and slap a new name on it?). Or do
they need a 10 ghz Pentium to be able to run the current bloat-ware
they have in the works?
Win-98 never needed an umbilical cord hooked up to the mothership like
XP obviously needs. I guess that's what it takes to keep XP from
eating itself up as it chugs along on the average home computer,
spewing spam right under the nose of the average idiot owner.
C
* * Chas
|
| So basically Micro$hit can't build a better OS, so instead they are
| trying to sell a subscription-based solution to XP (a live mechanic
| under every hood).
|
| NT, Win2K, and XP were all designed for corporate desktops, gov't,
| military, fortune-500 customers.
|
| It's that pesky, insecure home PC market that Micro$hit can't really
| provide a decent OS for. Historians will write about how M$ unleashed
| the vulnerable and over-managed XP on the home market after weak
| initial acceptance in the corporate world. 4 (or 5?) years later the
| intellectual brain trust in Redmond has gone dry (what, they can't
| come up with a new desktop motif and slap a new name on it?). Or do
| they need a 10 ghz Pentium to be able to run the current bloat-ware
| they have in the works?
|
| Win-98 never needed an umbilical cord hooked up to the mothership like
| XP obviously needs. I guess that's what it takes to keep XP from
| eating itself up as it chugs along on the average home computer,
| spewing spam right under the nose of the average idiot owner.
Right on brother! I have XP on several laptops for WiFi only. I run
Win98SE on almost all of my other systems because 1. I can easily fix
almost any problem in less than 15 minutes and 2. when the NT based OSs
have an application problem, it can take as long as 10 minutes to get
control of your system back. I can do a 3 finger in Win98SE and be back
running again in 2 minutes!
Chas.
| So basically Micro$hit can't build a better OS, so instead they are
| trying to sell a subscription-based solution to XP (a live mechanic
| under every hood).
|
| NT, Win2K, and XP were all designed for corporate desktops, gov't,
| military, fortune-500 customers.
|
| It's that pesky, insecure home PC market that Micro$hit can't really
| provide a decent OS for. Historians will write about how M$ unleashed
| the vulnerable and over-managed XP on the home market after weak
| initial acceptance in the corporate world. 4 (or 5?) years later the
| intellectual brain trust in Redmond has gone dry (what, they can't
| come up with a new desktop motif and slap a new name on it?). Or do
| they need a 10 ghz Pentium to be able to run the current bloat-ware
| they have in the works?
|
| Win-98 never needed an umbilical cord hooked up to the mothership like
| XP obviously needs. I guess that's what it takes to keep XP from
| eating itself up as it chugs along on the average home computer,
| spewing spam right under the nose of the average idiot owner.
Right on brother! I have XP on several laptops for WiFi only. I run
Win98SE on almost all of my other systems because 1. I can easily fix
almost any problem in less than 15 minutes and 2. when the NT based OSs
have an application problem, it can take as long as 10 minutes to get
control of your system back. I can do a 3 finger in Win98SE and be back
running again in 2 minutes!
Chas.