intel e1300 vs amd 4400+

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jure Sah
  • Start date Start date
J

Jure Sah

Hello,

I convinced a friend of mine to get an AMD 4400+ instead of an Intel e1300.

Now I want to proove it to him that the cpu is better. Alas, I cannot
find any comparable benchmarks between the two CPUs or even standalone
Intel e1300 benchmarks. When I google up "Intel e1300", it says 0 results.

Can someone help?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIhcKGB6mNZXe93qgRAkmnAJ9IhB2TgULvd0sYjOcLUnIEoaYLKQCeJqPq
Q43AT1GS+noES6azSW04eQk=
=npvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
* R. C. White:
Very few experienced Usenet readers will open an attachment from a
stranger, especially if there is no text at all in the message body.
Click to expand...

There is no attachment and there is text in the message body. It's just
your crap newsreader (Windows Mail aka Outlook Express) that doesn't
show any text and shows an attachment when there is none. You should
really get a better news client.

Benjamin
 
Benjamin Gawert pravi:
* R. C. White:


There is no attachment and there is text in the message body. It's just
your crap newsreader (Windows Mail aka Outlook Express) that doesn't
show any text and shows an attachment when there is none. You should
really get a better news client.
Click to expand...

I have to agree.

What you see is not an attachment, it's just a PGP signed message (a
certificate that makes sure that my content has not been tampered with
after I sent it and prooving that I sent it).

I suggest you use Thunderbird. It works a lot better and it's free. The
Enigmail addon for it will also verify the PGP signature.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIhlcIB6mNZXe93qgRAn0QAJ95AXZnRBCJT9lG+jw/3QhveMbcBQCghoWB
cfU9jYq0f9Uflp6D3R9KdNk=
=Ipdy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Rich Billionaire pravi:
Did you check out Tom's Hardware web site? They have comparisons of
all the AMD & Intel cpus.
Click to expand...

Yup. They have no benchmark for the E1300 either.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIhlgfB6mNZXe93qgRAlfmAJ0UBM/rCMW5e1xtNRnfRXZf/yP5/wCeN3z3
NKzxUZFWwozXhcvOD7AnWRY=
=yzPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Jure Sah pravi:
Rich Billionaire pravi:

Yup. They have no benchmark for the E1300 either.
Click to expand...

I just find it suspicious how nobody ever reviews shitty Intel CPUs.

Tom's hardware has reviews of even the AMD Sempron 3200+, but no mention
whatsoever of the E1300, or even the slightly less sucky E1400 (which
seems to exist on Google unlike the E1300).

No wonder so many people are convinced AMDs suck.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIhlpXB6mNZXe93qgRAlTwAJ4zMVPTEMdT5LaOYSbX0hbOeiMYUwCgoX8Q
IrlJQq46zYM4D9EAktQh6DE=
=GHeN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Hello,

I convinced a friend of mine to get an AMD 4400+ instead of an Intel e1300.

Now I want to proove it to him that the cpu is better. Alas, I cannot
find any comparable benchmarks between the two CPUs or even standalone
Intel e1300 benchmarks. When I google up "Intel e1300", it says 0 results.

Can someone help?
Click to expand...

You're talking about a processor that exists (AMD 4400+) to one that
does not exist (Intel E1300). It's no contest; the processor that
exists beats the one that doesn't.
 
Andy pravi:
You're talking about a processor that exists (AMD 4400+) to one that
does not exist (Intel E1300). It's no contest; the processor that
exists beats the one that doesn't.
Click to expand...

Funny how something I can buy in the local store for 50 € doesn'texist.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIhxPJB6mNZXe93qgRAvTCAKCSb9CqBGjSfZEPDm3ArAV8sLuiEQCbBelC
jSvtgQd0t7GXyUTWpx36shg=
=aYGR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Jure Sah pravi:
Andy pravi:

Funny how something I can buy in the local store for 50 € doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

From:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/247939-10-buyers-guide-updated-2008

--- Begin quote ---
Intel Celeron E1200*
Speed: 1.6GHz
Number of Cores: 2
Cache: 512KB
FSB: 800MHZ
Supported features: SpeedStep, 64bit computing, and NX disable bit.
Not supported features: Virtualization
eSpec: SLAQW/Stepping: M0

* This processor has 2 revisions: L2 and M0

E1300
Speed: 1.8GHz
Cores: 2
Cache: 512KB
FSB: 800MHz
Supported Features: N/A
Not supported Featurs: N/A
Rev: M0
eSpec: N/A

E1400
Speed: 2GHz
Cores: 2
Cache: 512KB
FSB: 800MHz
Supported Features: N/A
Not supported Featurs: N/A
Rev: L2
eSpec: N/A
---- End quote ----

How's that. Specs for a non-existent CPU!

The wonders of internet.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIhxUZB6mNZXe93qgRAlzBAJ9TMLObRnyupBFe7NROFaKCzLM4uACgidID
3y/azVYHCwVDKjQDoNBcU7A=
=DEur
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Back
Top