Insufficient Memory to Save Webpage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Diagnostic: "Insufficient Memory to Save this Webpage".
Trying to 'File Save As Web Archive' htm, anywhere on my drive this webpage:
http://digital-music-guide.classes.cnet.com/lesson-3/
Can save http://www.yahoo.com, or most any other ok.

Is there a logfile which details the error? What kind of memory. Have run
CCleaner to empty the temps etc. but didn't help. System Properties Advanced,
Performance Advanced Option is for Programs and Virtual Memory is Custom
min=768MB, max=1536, Allocated =768, Available Drive F =2282. Hardware
mem=512MB. Should I select System Managed ?

What memory are they referring to??
 
Try Ctrl+Alt+Delete to select Task Manager and click the Performance
Tab. Under Commit Charge what is the Total, the Limit and the Peak?

How large is your hard disk and how much free space. If partitioned
please provide details for each partition.

--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
TaskManPerf: Commit: Tot=289,952; Lim=1,280,393; Peak=413,132;
Chrge=282M/1250M; Physcl: Tot=523,760; Avbl=185,172; SysCache=241,876

From CompMgmt: Disk 0= 40G:
L1P(rimary)= Fat, 196M, Cap= 196M, Free= 188M;
L2P= Fat32, 3.82G, Cap= 3,81G, Free= 1.89G;
L3P= Fat32, 3.83G, Cap= 3.82G, Free= 1.90G;
L4E(xtended)= Fat32, 3.91G, Cap= 3.88G, Free= 1.40G;
L5E= fat32, 6G, Boot, Cap=5.97G, Free= 1.22G;
Unallocated=13.7G

I'm unable to save to any partition on Disk 0 (or to a 2nd disk).
 
Sorry for the sloppy qc. & thanks. Excuse - too many #'s from too many places.

From System Properties Advanced, Performance Advanced Option= Programs, and
Virtual Memory= Custom
min=768MB, max=1536M, Allocated =768M, Available Drive F: =1896M. Hardware
mem=512MB.

TaskManPerf: Commit: Tot=289,952; Lim=1,280,393; Peak=413,132;
Chrge=282M/1250M; Physcl: Tot=523,760; Avbl=185,172; SysCache=241,876

From CompMgmt: Drive 0= 31.49G
L1P(rimary)= Fat, 196M, Cap= 196M, Free= 188M;
L2P= Fat32, 3.82G, Cap= 3,81G, Free= 1.89G;
L3P= Fat32, 3.83G, Cap= 3.82G, Free= 1.90G;
L4E(xtended)= Fat32, 3.91G, Cap= 3.88G, Free= 1.40G;
L5E= fat32, 6G, Boot, Cap=5.97G, Free= 1.22G;
Unallocated=13.7G

From Explorer Props:
Drive F= L5E: Used= 4.88G, Free= 1.08G
Drive E= L4E: Used= 2.47G, Free= 1.39G

I'm unable to save to any partition on Disk 0 (or to a 2nd disk).
 
Why do you have so many partitions on what by today's standards is a
small hard drive. It is so fragmented that none of the partitions has
much capacity. What utility did you use to create these partitions? Why
did you choose to format them as FAT32?

In which partition is the page file?

Why aren't you using 13.7 gb on the first drive? It is shown as
unallocated!

How large is the second hard drive and how mich free disk space there?

Did the computer have another operating system on it before Windows XP?


--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Many partitions ... ways to play & learn: DOS, 98, Partitition Magic then XP,
Linux, multiboot, data & setup progs for easy reinstall access & backup ...
they sooth my ADD and attending insecurities. Fat32 so that all can see.

Page file is on L4E. The unallocated is for when needed. 2nd drive is also
40G, about 20G unused. I can push things around - partitions, Docs, Page,
etc, if I knew what. I could?should learn more what taskman is reporting
about 'commit charge'.

My system has been stable, managable & secure during it's few years of
evolution and experiment, especially XP. No recent manpulations.

The Disk 0 has a hidden Dos, 98, an unused XP, and my 'failsafe everyday'
L4E data, and L5E boot partitions. Disk 1 is my 'let me try this'. This can
happen when you retire but your brain doesn't.
 
From System Properties Advanced, Performance Advanced Option= Programs, and
Virtual Memory= Custom
min=768MB, max=1536M, Allocated =768M, Available Drive F: =1896M. Hardware
mem=512MB.

TaskManPerf: Commit: Tot=289,952; Lim=1,280,393; Peak=413,132;
Chrge=282M/1250M; Physcl: Tot=523,760; Avbl=185,172; SysCache=241,876

From CompMgmt: Drive 0= 31.49G
L1P(rimary)= Fat, 196M, Cap= 196M, Free= 188M, DOS
L2P= Fat32, 3.82G, Cap= 3,81G, Free= 1.89G, obsolete Win98
L3P= Fat32, 3.83G, Cap= 3.82G, Free= 1.90G, hidden, obsolete XP
L4E(xtended)= Fat32, 3.91G, Cap= 3.88G, Free= 1.40G, Data, Page
L5E= fat32, 6G, Boot, Cap=5.97G, Free= 1.22G, WinXP
Unallocated=13.7G

From Explorer Props:
L5E: Used= 4.88G, Free= 1.08G
L4E: Used= 2.47G, Free= 1.39G

I'm unable to save to any partition on Disk 0 (or to a 2nd disk).

Many partitions ... ways to play & learn: DOS, Win 98, Partitition Magic
then came XP, Linux, multiboot, data & setup progs for easy reinstall access
& backup ... they sooth my ADD and attending insecurities. Fat32 so that all
can see.

Page file is on L4E. The unallocated is for whenever I need it.
2nd drive is 40G, about 20G unused.

My system has been stable, managable & secure during it's few years of
evolution and experiment, especially XP. The D0 drive is my 'failsafe
everyday' and D1 is my 'let me try this'. This can happen when you retire.
 
Let's leave your highly complicated partition structure as that may have
no bearing on your original enquiry.

When you use Save As on the web site you are presented with on my
computer with four file types fro which to make a choice. The default
seems to be Webpage, complete etc. If I opt for that file type I get
your error message. However, if I select Webpage, html only it saves. I
do not know what is the difference between the two but that is what I am
seeing.

In Google there are at least two other threads on the same topic
involving different web sites to the one you quote. Some users had your
problem and some not. I think the solution lies is in the file type
selected.

--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Yep. The most techical explanation I found claimed that the local UNC
conversion file names for some sites was too long, but I tried shortening
which didn't work either. The problem definitely involves some property of
the particular webpage.

This anomaly existed in IE6 also.

Thanks for your efforts.
Ed
 
Jt confirms the conclusion I had reached when I made my last post,
although they have dug a little deeper than I went.


--
Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Back
Top