Instant Messaging via WLMDbeta

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darrell
  • Start date Start date
D

Darrell

I tried to send an IM via WLMDbeta (Actions menu - "Send and Instant
Message") to a contact that was online and I noticed that all the options
for Instant Messaging through WLMDbeta are grayed out or not selectable. Is
this feature currently working with WLMDbeta? Both systems are running
Windows XP SP2, IE7B3 and WLM.
 
Darrell said:
I tried to send an IM via WLMDbeta (Actions menu - "Send and Instant
Message") to a contact that was online and I noticed that all the options
for Instant Messaging through WLMDbeta are grayed out or not selectable.
Is this feature currently working with WLMDbeta? Both systems are running
Windows XP SP2, IE7B3 and WLM.
Click to expand...

Logged on to WLM and WLMD with a mail from a contact (online and offline
contacts) selected in WLMD I can IM that contact.
 
sim.seb said:
Logged on to WLM and WLMD with a mail from a contact (online and offline
contacts) selected in WLMD I can IM that contact.
Click to expand...


Thanks for your response...I can Instant Message by the way you described
from WLMD by selecting an e-mail from a contact (online or offline). But it
seems to me that you should be able to do this without having to select an
e-mail from a contact. If the contact is online and you have WLMD open, you
should be able to go to the "Actions" menu and send an instant message, but
all IM options are grayed out. Is this a bug or was it intended to be that
way? I would definitely like to make this suggestion to the developers of
WLMD.
 
Darrell said:
Thanks for your response...I can Instant Message by the way you described
from WLMD by selecting an e-mail from a contact (online or offline). But
it seems to me that you should be able to do this without having to select
an e-mail from a contact. If the contact is online and you have WLMD
open, you should be able to go to the "Actions" menu and send an instant
message, but all IM options are grayed out. Is this a bug or was it
intended to be that way? I would definitely like to make this suggestion
to the developers of WLMD.
Click to expand...

I suppose it was intended that way: replying a mail by IM. But I agree the
integration of WLMD and WLM at this point ain't wat it should be. But
otherwise u wouldn't need WLM anymore.
 
sim.seb said:
I suppose it was intended that way: replying a mail by IM. But I agree the
integration of WLMD and WLM at this point ain't wat it should be. But
otherwise u wouldn't need WLM anymore.
Click to expand...

The integration of WLM is needed for WLMD...WLM is where your contact
information is stored for WLMD to draw upon. Let's just hope that further
integration occurs between the two so that you can IM a contact without
first having to select a contact's e-mail. If any deleveloper or MVP knows
more about the integration between the two, please enlighten.
 
Darrell said:
The integration of WLM is needed for WLMD...WLM is where your contact information is stored
for WLMD to draw upon. Let's just hope that further integration occurs between the two so
that you can IM a contact without first having to select a contact's e-mail. If any
deleveloper or MVP knows more about the integration between the two, please enlighten.
Click to expand...

If you ask me, well, I'm telling it anyway- the whole situation with WLMD
is just ignorant. Why in the world have Windows Mail and Windows Live
Mail Desktop? Just iggnut. For those folks not using Vista- it's just as
iggnut to have Outlook Express and WLMD. Why in the world has Microsoft
created this malfunction of mass confusion?

To top it off, the ever wise sages at Microsoft send *all* WLMD users here-
to a Windows Vista group devoted to Windows Mail. Just iggnut.


-Michael
 
Back
Top