Installshield fails with .Net 1.1 and 2.0 installed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lloyd Sargent
  • Start date Start date
L

Lloyd Sargent

We have an application that requires .Net 1.1 and 2.0. However,
Installshield throws an error when we do this (XPE Target Designer
isn't very happy either, but still allows us to build it).

Is it even POSSIBLE to have .Net 1.1 and 2.0 coexist in XPE?

And does anyone know why Installshield would complain? This is the
error we get:

"1642: Error installing Microsoft(R) .NET Framework. Could not verify
digital signature of the file %s. You need Internet Explorer 3.02 with
Authenticode update."

Cheers,

Lloyd
 
We are using the trial of XP Embedded (not Standard).

We tried using the components for .Net and altho we get a nastygram,
it still built. However, when we tried to use InstallShield it checks
to see if .Net is installed (if not, we install it).

Our installer is set up to install .Net 1.1 and 2.0 if they are not
installed - we don't know if this is the problem. Shotgunning it does
not appear to be getting us any useful results.

Ideally we would like to have 1.1. and 2.0 as our application requires
both.

Cheers,

Lloyd
 
If you have installed trial version of XP Embedded SP2 with Feature Pack
2007 + Update Rollup 1.0, then you don't want to use the .NET 2.0 component.
Use the .NET 1.1 and .NET 3.0 Setup components. .NET 3.0 will install .NET
2.0.

Otherwise, try using .NET 1.1 component only and then install .NET 2.0.
Don't use the .NET 2.0 component.
--
Regards,

Sean Liming
www.sjjmicro.com / www.seanliming.com
Book Author - XP Embedded Advanced, XP Embedded Supplemental Toolkit
We are using the trial of XP Embedded (not Standard).

We tried using the components for .Net and altho we get a nastygram,
it still built. However, when we tried to use InstallShield it checks
to see if .Net is installed (if not, we install it).

Our installer is set up to install .Net 1.1 and 2.0 if they are not
installed - we don't know if this is the problem. Shotgunning it does
not appear to be getting us any useful results.

Ideally we would like to have 1.1. and 2.0 as our application requires
both.

Cheers,

Lloyd
 
Back
Top