I'm looking. I'm seeing you advice those who may not have you 'alleged'
grip on this with questionable suggestions.
I installes something like around 600 Vista OSs and never had a
probplem with any instalation.
I never use a spell chacker either.... but I don't lie.
Let Vista do it's thing and only then you
install the rest.
It starts with the install.... then comes VISTA.
It eliminates a lot of future problems people get were
win wants to install updates and can't etc.
MAYBE that person doesn't WANT automatic updates, eh? Ever thought of
such a thing? CONTROLLING what your computer does or doesn't do ??
UNDERSTANDING where problems may have crepts in by following a
proceedure that lets you keep tabs on changes?
I make a living fixing comps
and have been with vista since RC1.
You darned sure don't make a living spelling or think much about your advice.
27 years now... started with a TRS80 and then Macs.... moved to PCs
with the advent of Win-95. About 30% of my income comes from working
on PCs,.... so my child, I HAVE TRIED IT.
Caretaker,
It's not advisable.... I don't care that you have installed an average of over
three VISTA OS-es per day since the release, even though we all know
that is a serious crock of crap. Never let a new monster loose to "Do it's
thing". If you don't know what the OS consists of before you slam into
"automated" mode, you're a goner for EVER having a grip on what may
develop as an 'issue'. Even on an upgrade.... if it's not coming as a
download, the only *safe* thing to do is get a million miles from the I-net
and then configure the system properly for internet protocols when it's
loaded... then decide what bullshit processes you want updating themselves
OR NOT as they rear their ugly heads.
--
David B. Morgan (MAMS)
Morgan Audio Media Service
http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com
Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901
_____________________________
http://www.januarysound.com