You said it yourself. It is just a folder name, so why change it? What
possible difference could it make changing the name of the folder, other
than to satisfy some arcane desire to be different?
The Vista install is a preset image with a driver install routine. It allows
for a fast and reliable install, just 25 mins or so depending upon the
performance of the hardware. This is no step backwards, and as long as the
hardware is compliant, leads to a far more reliable working system.
There probably is something somewhere which explains it all, but I do not
have access to it. I can only tell you what I have been told.
Just for the record, why have you elected to change the folder name in the
past?
It was a recommendation from a consulting company - back in the old
days of NT 4.0. As far as I remember the reason behind it was that for
some viruses it is more difficult to attack the system when the system
does not reside in C:\WINDOWS (not every virus was smart enough to
check for the %SYSTEMROOT% setting). Since then we've created many
scripts that are run from outside the Windwows machine (so it is not
so easy for them to check for %Systemroot%) and have hardcoded our new
Systemroot name (e.g. C:\OS).
By the way, do you know what would happen if I would upgrade in-place
my XP installation that had SYSTEMROOT different from C:\WINDOWS?
Would Vista retain the old name? If so, perhaps that is the possible
workaround (first to install a fresh copy of XP with modified system
name, and then upgrade it in-place)?
Of course, the other option is to modify the scripts and all the
environment, but I am just curious if I can make Vista sit where I
want ;-)
Best regards,
Marlin