D
deet
I would appreciate recommendations for an inkjet printer , for
personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE,
TIA
personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE,
TIA
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
P
Peter
Look for a HP deskjet 3845, but be sure it has the driver diskI would appreciate recommendations for an inkjet printer , for
personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE,
TIA
J
Jan Alter
Peter said:Look for a HP deskjet 3845, but be sure it has the driver disk
For general printing and decent photos the C88+ works. It uses 4 chipped
cartridges.
T
TJ
If interested in an all-in-one type, the HP PSC 2110 works just fineI would appreciate recommendations for an inkjet printer , for
personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE,
TIA
with Windows 98SE. With any HP printer, be sure to get the driver disk.
Windows 98 drivers are no longer available from HP.
TJ
B
Bill
I would appreciate recommendations for an inkjet printer , for
personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE,
TIA
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16828103070
Bill
M
measekite
because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all yourTJ said:If interested in an all-in-one type, the HP PSC 2110 works just fine
with Windows 98SE. With any HP printer, be sure to get the driver
disk. Windows 98 drivers are no longer available from HP.
computer can run then it is time to get a new computer.
J
Jan Alter
measekite said:because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all your
computer can run then it is time to get a new computer. MK
because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all your
computer can run then it is time to get a new computer.
Lots of people run Win98. It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed.
Even using that OS people can turn out good photos.
Are you having a bad day?
M
measekite
Jan Alter wrote:
"measekite" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
TJ wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
I would appreciate recommendations for an inkjet printer , for personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE, TIA -- deet
If interested in an all-in-one type, the HP PSC 2110 works just fine with Windows 98SE. With any HP printer, be sure to get the driver disk. Windows 98 drivers are no longer available from HP.
because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all your computer can run then it is time to get a new computer.
TJ
MK
because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all your computer can run then it is time to get a new computer.
Lots of people run Win98.
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed. Even using that OS people can turn out good photos. Are you having a bad day?
"measekite" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
TJ wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
I would appreciate recommendations for an inkjet printer , for personal use, which will run under Windows 98.SE, TIA -- deet
If interested in an all-in-one type, the HP PSC 2110 works just fine with Windows 98SE. With any HP printer, be sure to get the driver disk. Windows 98 drivers are no longer available from HP.
because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all your computer can run then it is time to get a new computer.
TJ
MK
because Win98 is garbage, worse than the rest. If that is all your computer can run then it is time to get a new computer.
Lots of people run Win98.
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed. Even using that OS people can turn out good photos. Are you having a bad day?
T
TJ
measekite said:Jan Alter wrote:
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually
know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They
should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get
the idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use"
might be. Could be anything.
Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured
mementos. Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of
my now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took
the photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year
before, and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that
still exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it
hadn't been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The
GIMP. I then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and
gave it to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next
to the color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows
98 - another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for
that four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet.
TJ
J
Jan Alter
(e-mail address removed)12.pa.us
only to point out that Win '98 had the capability of achieving fine results
for whatever the user intended; snapshots, text, graphics, CAD, whatever. I
see no reason to malign an older OS or its user because he/she is not using
the newest equipment or software. And even if a reader disagrees with an
opinion, verbalizing that thought without sarcasm or negativity leaves room
for either more discussion or ill will.
Agreed! I was surmising the idea of 'photos' to use as a general exampleTJ said:Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get the
idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use" might
be. Could be anything.
Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured mementos.
Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of my
now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took the
photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year before,
and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that still
exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it hadn't
been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The GIMP. I
then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and gave it
to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next to the
color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows 98 -
another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for that
four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet.
TJ
only to point out that Win '98 had the capability of achieving fine results
for whatever the user intended; snapshots, text, graphics, CAD, whatever. I
see no reason to malign an older OS or its user because he/she is not using
the newest equipment or software. And even if a reader disagrees with an
opinion, verbalizing that thought without sarcasm or negativity leaves room
for either more discussion or ill will.
J
Jan Alter
Should be
either more discussion NOR ill will.
either more discussion NOR ill will.
B
Burt
(snipped typical MK snide remarks)TJ said:measekite wrote:
Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get the
idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use" might
be. Could be anything.
Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured mementos.
Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of my
now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took the
photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year before,
and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that still
exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it hadn't
been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The GIMP. I
then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and gave it
to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next to the
color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows 98 -
another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for that
four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet.
TJ
TJ - what our perennial troll doesn't consider is that computers, operating
systems, printers, inks, software, etc., are merely tools, and that the
product you derive using these tools is the essence of what all this tech
stuff is about. The "newest, best, most powerful computer, operating
system, or printer" isn't necessary for many users. Case in point - I
haven't seen any posts from MK indicating that he has replaced his ip4000
printer, several generations old in the Canon line, by a new pro-line Canon
printer. I guess he is still satisfied with the photos he prints with this
"old technology." Just as I am delighted with the results from my i960 and
ip5000 printers.
B
Burt
Jan Alter said:(e-mail address removed)12.pa.us
Agreed! I was surmising the idea of 'photos' to use as a general
example only to point out that Win '98 had the capability of achieving
fine results for whatever the user intended; snapshots, text, graphics,
CAD, whatever. I see no reason to malign an older OS or its user because
he/she is not using the newest equipment or software. And even if a reader
disagrees with an opinion, verbalizing that thought without sarcasm or
negativity leaves room for either more discussion or ill will.
Jan - as we all know, MK is the West Coast Distributer for ill will.
M
measekite
Some see what they want to see while others cannot see at all.
TJ wrote: measekite wrote:
Jan Alter wrote:
Lots of people run Win98.
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed.
Even using that OS people can turn out good photos.
Are you having a bad day?
Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get the idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use" might be. Could be anything.
Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured mementos. Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of my now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took the photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year before, and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that still exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it hadn't been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The GIMP. I then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and gave it to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next to the color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows 98 - another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for that four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet.
TJ
TJ wrote: measekite wrote:
Jan Alter wrote:
Lots of people run Win98.
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed.
Even using that OS people can turn out good photos.
Are you having a bad day?
Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get the idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use" might be. Could be anything.
Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured mementos. Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of my now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took the photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year before, and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that still exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it hadn't been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The GIMP. I then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and gave it to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next to the color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows 98 - another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for that four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet.
TJ
M
measekite
Jan Alter wrote:
[email protected] "TJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
measekite wrote:
Jan Alter wrote:
Lots of people run Win98.
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed. Even using that OS people can turn out good photos. Are you having a bad day?
Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get the idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use" might be. Could be anything. Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured mementos. Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of my now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took the photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year before, and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that still exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it hadn't been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The GIMP. I then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and gave it to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next to the color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows 98 - another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for that four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet. TJ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Agreed! I was surmising the idea of 'photos' to use as a general example only to point out that Win '98 had the capability of achieving fine results for whatever the user intended; snapshots, text, graphics, CAD, whatever. I see no reason to malign an older OS or its user because he/she is not using the newest equipment or software. And even if a reader disagrees with an opinion, verbalizing that thought without sarcasm or negativity leaves room for either more discussion or ill will.
Win 98 was junk when it came out. Today it is aged worthless junk.
[email protected] "TJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
measekite wrote:
Jan Alter wrote:
Lots of people run Win98.
I find that people who subject themselves to this old technology usually know very little about computers and most likely are snapshooters. They should snapshoot and get their prints at Costco.
It's nothing for anyone to get disturbed. Even using that OS people can turn out good photos. Are you having a bad day?
Newsflash, guys - the O.P. said "for personal use." Where did you get the idea he's printing photos? He didn't say what that "personal use" might be. Could be anything. Nothing wrong with snapshots, either. They can become treasured mementos. Ask my mother. A while back I came across a snapshot I took of my now-deceased brother on his first Christmas, forty years ago. I took the photo with a Swinger B+W Polaroid camera I had been given the year before, and it is the only photo of my brother from that Christmas that still exists, as far as I know. The photo had deteriorated because it hadn't been stored properly, but I scanned it and repaired it using The GIMP. I then printed a 5x7 print with my aftermarket ink, framed it, and gave it to her for Christmas this year. It now hangs on the wall, next to the color print of him that I printed for his funeral - using Windows 98 - another snapshot that is treasured. And BTW, I'm still waiting for that four-year-old framed print to show some fading. I don't see any yet. TJ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Agreed! I was surmising the idea of 'photos' to use as a general example only to point out that Win '98 had the capability of achieving fine results for whatever the user intended; snapshots, text, graphics, CAD, whatever. I see no reason to malign an older OS or its user because he/she is not using the newest equipment or software. And even if a reader disagrees with an opinion, verbalizing that thought without sarcasm or negativity leaves room for either more discussion or ill will.
Win 98 was junk when it came out. Today it is aged worthless junk.
F
Frank
measekite wrote:
------------------------------------
Who are you kidding, huh? You've got two old printers and one nikon
camera and you fancy yourself as being a "photographer"...hahahaha...LOL!
You're an idiot who also just happens to be a real moron loser.
I've seen your pics and they STINK! Just like you do. You don't have a
photographer's eye. You're a wannabe and you're a real loser and only a
snap shooter.
Anyone who believes one word from you must be brain dead.
Get lost and go get a real life and STOP SPAMMING THIS NG!!!
Frank
------------------------------------
Who are you kidding, huh? You've got two old printers and one nikon
camera and you fancy yourself as being a "photographer"...hahahaha...LOL!
You're an idiot who also just happens to be a real moron loser.
I've seen your pics and they STINK! Just like you do. You don't have a
photographer's eye. You're a wannabe and you're a real loser and only a
snap shooter.
Anyone who believes one word from you must be brain dead.
Get lost and go get a real life and STOP SPAMMING THIS NG!!!
Frank