HI Eric,
Has your problem been resolved?
If you still have any unclear, please feel free to let me know.
Best regards,
Jeffrey Tan
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
--------------------
| From: "Eric" <
[email protected]>
| References: <#
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Inheritance Question
| Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:23:26 -0600
| Lines: 54
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
| NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.207.45.37
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp:192106
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
|
| Thanks for all your posts. I will have to look at my design and see if I
| can change it. Here is what I am doing: I have a overrided method called
| for each derived class and in each class which does something particular
to
| the derived class and it then needs to call a method in base which needs
to
| know which derived class called it.
|
| Thanks
|
| | > Doug Forster wrote:
| >
| > > Hi Eric,
| > >
| > > Though you can do as Chris describes, you might like to consider
whether
| you
| > > have correctly encapsulated your child class functionality. Code that
| > > explicitly examines type can often be generalised via a virtual
method.
| > >
| > > Cheers
| > >
| > > Doug Forster
| > >
| > > | > >
| > >>Hi,
| > >>
| > >>I have a base class with a method that need to determine which derived
| > >
| > > class
| > >
| > >>(child class) called it. How can I do this?
| > >>
| > >>Thanks
| > >>
| > >>
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > I agree. If you need to find the "derived" class from a base class, you
| > have something in base class that is not generalized enough. If you can,
| > you might want to also attempt delegation pattern instead of inheritence
| > which gives you better control over things.
| >
| > Or wait till generics come out. If its implemented in any manner like
| > VC++, you can probably use the great ATL trick of using the child class
| > as an input template argument..
| >
| > --
| > Girish Bharadwaj
| >
|
|
|