G
george
I have a paper stock report that I receive on a monthly
basis. On this report I base a table in Access. There is a
direct correspondance between the columns on the paper
report and the columns in my table. This is the problem:
the first column in my table, StockName, is based on a
combo box which displays the name of a stock but it stores
a number underneath, for each stock (for performance
reasons of course). On the other hand, I have to scan my
paper report, pass the data to Excel and then import them
from Access. In this case however I have text passed to my
first column, StockName, so I get a message error (text to
a number field). How can I bypass this problem? In general
is there a more efficient way of doing this monthly chore?
basis. On this report I base a table in Access. There is a
direct correspondance between the columns on the paper
report and the columns in my table. This is the problem:
the first column in my table, StockName, is based on a
combo box which displays the name of a stock but it stores
a number underneath, for each stock (for performance
reasons of course). On the other hand, I have to scan my
paper report, pass the data to Excel and then import them
from Access. In this case however I have text passed to my
first column, StockName, so I get a message error (text to
a number field). How can I bypass this problem? In general
is there a more efficient way of doing this monthly chore?