Importing Publisher website into Frontpage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I've got a web site designed in Publisher 2003 and I was wondering if there
is any way of importing this into Frontpage 2003.

Thanks
 
Save the publisher file as html....then in Frontpage, open your Web, then
File (menu) > Import (option), then choose the folders and/or files to
import.

Best advice is don't design/build your website in Publisher.
 
If you like:
lots of images instead of text
being ignored by search engines (because the text is embedded in
images)
sites that can only be viewed in Internet Explorer (other browsers
with difficulty or loss of clarity)
very large pages (AKA code bloat)

then Publisher is the way to go. But do not try to edit in FrontPage.

You *can* make a reasonable looking web site in Publisher, but it will
have all (or most of) the above faults. You must use the website
template, though, any other template will give you nightmares trying
to untangle the mess in any other editor.

Publisher is an excellent tool for producing printed documents - it
was not designed for web pages. Use the correct tool for the job.
 
Yes - save it as html, then import it into Frontpage.

But it is not recommended! Create the site in Frontpage from scratch.
Publisher is not a web design tool.
 
Publisher creates bloated code (and XML), which may only be viewable in IE
browsers (latest one at that eg ver 5.5 upwards) and slow loading pages;

You're using a tool not designed for the task. All MS's products have the
ability to create "web pages" (use of quotes is deliberate sarcasm intended)
Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Publisher can all do export their document format
(xls, doc, ppt, pub) to html but that is not their primary function.

Where as Frontpage saves as HTML to start with. HTML *is* its file format,
there is no "export to HTML" or anything of that nature.
 
Because Publisher is an tool for creating printed pages. The web is very
different from paper and what works really well on paper can be a problem on
the screen. If for no other reason is that with print you have specific
dimensions that will never vary and the colors will remain the same from
page to page. While web pages are viewed on a variety of browsers from
cellphone screens to ones like mine that are 1050px wide and 1400px high
(opposite of the more normal display modes since I use a tablet pc in
portrait mode). Also, you have browser differences, operating system
differences and other things beyond the designer's control. Within 50' of me
there are 8 computers, 2 pocket pcs, 3 cellphones. All of which are capable
of displaying web pages. The screen size ranges from approx. 85px wide to
1400. Screen physical sizes range from 1.2 inches to 17. One uses a CRT, 5
use some sort of analog LCD and one uses an Apple Digital Studio monitor.
Then there is the PowerBook and I'm not sure if it is an analog or digital
screen. Mac color gamma is significantly different from that of a PC. I
neglected to mention the issue of people who use TV set top boxes to access
the net. A guy I know uses MSN TV at home instead of a computer. The guy has
been a programmer since the 60s but prefers to sit in his recliner and use a
wireless keyboard to read his email or surf the web in a window on his big
screen TV during football games.

Compare those variables with printing on an 8.5x11 inch piece of paper.


--
Cheryl D. Wise
MS FrontPage MVP
http://mvp.wiserways.com
http://starttoweb.com
Online instructor led web design training in FrontPage,
Dreamweaver and more!
 
I'm responding inline.

--
Cheryl D. Wise
MS FrontPage MVP
http://mvp.wiserways.com
http://starttoweb.com
Online instructor led web design training in FrontPage,
Dreamweaver and more!


SPasse said:
Cheryl,

Take these comments with a grain of salt, as I am hardware engineer, not a
Web publisher, by any stretch of the imagination.

But the very resolution issues that you mention may provide an alternate
perspective on how to deal with the "Ideal Page Size" issue.. namely that
there is no optimum presentation resolution.

So for the newbe, who simply wants to create a Web page that:

1 Looks good on a 1024 x 768 display.

Stick to 800x600, despite the increasing popularity of bigger display over
30% still use 800x600 or less. Then there is the issue that most people
using higher resolution browsers do so so they can have more applications
open or have sidebars open.
2 Prints directly on a 8 ½ x 11" piece of paper, without clipping and the
need to resort to a "Printer Friendly" alternate screen format button.

Design for 800x600 and it will should print with no problems but you can
have problems printing if you page layout is wider than that. Besides with
CSS I don't need to create a separate format, just apply a print specific
stylesheet. That means I can hide menus and other items that are not needed
on the printed version.
3 The test & graphics tools look and feel like some variation of word,
which
for better or worse is what 90% of people these days learned about "page
layout"

My personal "desktop" consists of two 1280 x 1024 digital LCD monitors on
a
dual head graphics card. So for me, having a 2560 x 1024 "desktop" does
not
mean that I have any need to see Web pages that could exploit this total
area.

Agree, my tablet runs at 1400x1050 or more likely 1050x1400 since I work
mostly in portrait mode.
Publisher allowed me to build a functional Web site in one evenings work,
with little/no prior experience.

FrontPage will as well and you don't develop bad habits to unlearn.
As it turns out, I am at a point where I have "outgrown" Publisher and
will
be purchasing FrontPage over the next few days, but if someone who wants a
simple to use tool for getting their feet wet with Web site creation,
Publisher might just do the trick.

I'll stand by using FrontPage over Publisher, better code, better cross
browser and cross platform rendering and it is not more difficult to use.
By the way, HTML by definition is bloatwear. (That's a little jab from
guys
who cut their teeth writing machine language code. ;) )

HTML is mark-up not machine code, anything written for people is more
"bloated" than that written for machines.
 
Back
Top