Import versus POP3

  • Thread starter Thread starter MN
  • Start date Start date
M

MN

Hi,

Are there any difference in handling the stream of data when importing from
an outlook folder
compared with using POP3

MN
 
How do we need to interpret this question? What are you trying to achieve?
Importing is done from a local source and the POP3 protocol makes a
connection to a mail server to download messages from that server.
 
My question is about how an utf-8 encoded message is handled.
In one case, the import from a folder in exchange messages get corrupted.
When using the POP3 an utf-8 encoded messages arrives without any corruption
 
You'll have to be much more clear than that.
Where are you importing from?
What kind of corruption are you experiencing?
Some version information might be helpful as well.

Really, spare no detail; we cannot look over your shoulder or guess what are
you trying to solve. The more information you provide the better answer we
could give.
 
MN said:
Are there any difference in handling the stream of data when importing from
an outlook folder
compared with using POP3
Click to expand...

Outlook is an e-mail client. It does not supported streamed data. Nothing
shows up in Outlook until the entire package of data gets received. Outlook
*downloads* the e-mails.

You don't import from an Outlook folder. You import from a file.

You have a jumbled mess of technical terms in your vocabulary that you are
spewing out without them actually applying to the software you are asking
about.
 
MN said:
My question is about how an utf-8 encoded message is handled.
In one case, the import from a folder in exchange messages get corrupted.
When using the POP3 an utf-8 encoded messages arrives without any corruption
Click to expand...

And just what does "corruption" mean? What do you see? What did you expect
to see? Is part of the e-mail missing? What?

So what did the Exchange admin say about this "corruption" of e-mail content
delivered to your Exchange mailbox?
 
Back
Top