Implement a "deactivate" transaction.

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Hind
  • Start date Start date
J

John Hind

It is INTENSLY annoying to honest customers when licence enforcement measures
in software interfere with usage which is allowed by the licence terms or
which seems to be "fair use" to a reasonable person.

My Vista Ultimate licence says I can move the software to new machines
provided I am using it on on one machine only, yet after a modest number of
incremental upgrades and rebuilds I am reduced forever to having to exchange
48-digit numbers with Microsoft by telephone. I fail to see what extra
security this gives Microsoft against pirates since I've never been asked any
identifying or searching questions!

MS could very easily make this better both for customers and for themselves.
As well as having an "Activate Windows" transaction as at present also have a
"Deactivate Windows" transaction. This would return that copy of Windows to
the deactivated state and notify MS that the licence was not in use (or
decrement any usage counter). This would allow automated activation again for
that licence. This would help customers who regularly upgrade or reinstall
and would also provide a real guarantee to MS that the licence was not being
used more than once. Of course it does not help with the situation were a
computer or system disk fails unexpectidly and has to be replaced since it
would not then be possible to execute the deactivate transaction. But it
would address the majority of practical cases.



----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/co...osoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup
 
John said:
It is INTENSLY annoying to honest customers when licence enforcement measures
in software interfere with usage which is allowed by the licence terms or
which seems to be "fair use" to a reasonable person.

I'm sorry for your inconvenience, and I do think Microsoft could have
better implemented WPA to make it less intrusive, but you've badly
misinterpreted the meaning of "Fair Use."

"Fair Use" is a very narrowly defined legal concept that simply
doesn't apply:

TITLE 17 , CHAPTER 1 , Sec. 107.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

U.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html



--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
 
Bruce Chambers said:
"Fair Use" is a very narrowly defined legal concept that simply
doesn't apply:

TITLE 17 , CHAPTER 1 , Sec. 107.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

U.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

I do not think even the US Copyright Office would allow copyrighting of an
ordinary English phrase like "fair use"! I specifically related it to the
perceptions of "a reasonable person" rather than the laws of one particular
country, and I did not capitalise the phrase as you did in quoting me. In any
case, this is a side issue to my main point since Activation is making it
gratuitously difficult to use my software in ways which are in full
compliance with the letter of the licence.
 
Back
Top