IMAP/HTTP Folders (still) Callapse

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

It appears that the beta bug of IMAP/HTTP folders callapsing on thier own when re-starting (ie: not keeping the use setting) is still present...

I thought that had been fixed post B2TR...Could anyone else confirm this is still the case? -or is my installation "contaminated" with previous builds remaining?

Thanks

William
 
William,

I am indeed able to reproduce the behavior you described to me.
However, I can find no documentation as to this being expected behavior or
a problem in Outlook 2003. We welcome your feedback on this functionality
fo Outlook. Please send e-mail to (e-mail address removed) and let us know
how YOU believe Outlook should function. Out product teams use YOUR
feedback in designing new features for Outlook, when plannign the upcoming
releases. I will also bring this up internally, and see if I can get any
additional details. I will post again to this thread if I see anything.


Best Regards,

Ryan M. Keith, BSCSE, MCSE
Microsoft Enterprise Messaging Support
Client Server Infrastructure

--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
--------------------
Thread-Topic: IMAP/HTTP Folders (still) Callapse
thread-index: AcOZSzF27st8lqKNQGuh/vbm8IKwJg==
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.outlook.general
From: "=?Utf-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBEb3dlbGw=?="
Click to expand...
Subject: IMAP/HTTP Folders (still) Callapse
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:51:12 -0700
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.outlook.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTCMTY1 10.40.1.180
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA06.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.outlook.general:188425
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.outlook.general

It appears that the beta bug of IMAP/HTTP folders callapsing on thier own
Click to expand...
when re-starting (ie: not keeping the use setting) is still present...

I thought that had been fixed post B2TR...Could anyone else confirm this is
still the case? -or is my installation "contaminated" with previous builds
remaining?

Thanks

William
 
William,

I am able to reproduce what you are seieng in both Outlook 2002, and
Outlook 2003. I can also find some internal documentation which details
this as "by design." This means that the product teams are having Outlook
collapse this folder list on purpose, and OUtlook is behaving as expected.

We welcome your feedback on this functionality fo Outlook. Please send
e-mail to (e-mail address removed) and let us know how YOU believe Outlook
should function. Out product teams use YOUR feedback in designing new
features for Outlook, when plannign the upcoming releases.



Best Regards,

Ryan M. Keith, BSCSE, MCSE
Microsoft Enterprise Messaging Support
Client Server Infrastructure

--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
--------------------
X-Tomcat-ID: 191239094
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: (e-mail address removed) (Ryan M. Keith [MSFT])
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:29:42 GMT
Subject: RE: IMAP/HTTP Folders (still) Callapse
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.outlook.general
Message-ID: <#[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.outlook.general
Lines: 57
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.outlook.general:188979
NNTP-Posting-Host: TOMCATIMPORT2 10.201.218.182

William,

I am indeed able to reproduce the behavior you described to me.
However, I can find no documentation as to this being expected behavior or
a problem in Outlook 2003. We welcome your feedback on this functionality
fo Outlook. Please send e-mail to (e-mail address removed) and let us know
how YOU believe Outlook should function. Out product teams use YOUR
feedback in designing new features for Outlook, when plannign the upcoming
releases. I will also bring this up internally, and see if I can get any
additional details. I will post again to this thread if I see anything.


Best Regards,

Ryan M. Keith, BSCSE, MCSE
Microsoft Enterprise Messaging Support
Client Server Infrastructure

--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
--------------------
Thread-Topic: IMAP/HTTP Folders (still) Callapse
thread-index: AcOZSzF27st8lqKNQGuh/vbm8IKwJg==
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.outlook.general
From: "=?Utf-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBEb3dlbGw=?="
Click to expand...
Subject: IMAP/HTTP Folders (still) Callapse
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:51:12 -0700
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.outlook.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTCMTY1 10.40.1.180
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA06.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.outlook.general:188425
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.outlook.general

It appears that the beta bug of IMAP/HTTP folders callapsing on thier own
Click to expand...
when re-starting (ie: not keeping the use setting) is still present...

I thought that had been fixed post B2TR...Could anyone else confirm this is
still the case? -or is my installation "contaminated" with previous builds
remaining?

Thanks

William
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top