I'm starting to like Vista

  • Thread starter Thread starter PTravel
  • Start date Start date
P

PTravel

I've just spent the last 10 days or so bringing up my new Vaio SZ440 that
came with Vista Business installed. It's been a struggle -- I've had to
find workarounds to get a lot of my software and hardware running, and there
are still one or two things that just won't work under Vista. Some of the
problems result from incompatible drivers or software and, presumably, will
be fixed by the product manufacturers with patches or driver updates.
Others, however, are clearly Vista bugs (for example, IP stack corruption).

All of that aside, however, my laptop is now ticking like a well-oiled clock
and I find there is a lot to like about the OS. On my machine, it's
lightning fast, very smooth and, though not crash-proof, I have to work very
hard to bring it down. I'll note, though, that I've disabled UAC and
Windows Defender. The former is too much of a pain, and there are good
third-party alternatives for the latter. As soon as I can find a
Vista-compatible one, I'll replace Windows Firewall as well. I like
Gadgets -- it's nice to have weather radar on my desktop whenever I need it.

The only remaining serious bug is slow file transfers over the network. I'm
getting around that by using FTP at home, but that's like going backwards 20
years. Microsoft has to address that issue.

Also, I'm pretty good with computers and my abilities were severely taxed by
trying to find workarounds and alternative methods for getting software and
hardware to run. I can't imagine what a naive use would do -- probably give
up and buy a Mac.

I'm sure a lot of the trouble is attibutable simply to Vista being a new OS.
As it ages and more computers ship with it, it will become the standard for
hardware and software developers and everything will run fine out of the
box. For now, though, I'd discourage any early adopters from trying it
unless they're really familiar with what's going on "under the hood."
 
Thanks for the post! That goes in line with a lot of the findings here.

One question. What problems did you have with Defender?

Not sure why you turned off UAC...it's perfect! :)
 
Thanks for the post! That goes in line with a lot of the findings here.

One question. What problems did you have with Defender?

Not sure why you turned off UAC...it's perfect! :)

UAC is as "perfect" as you are Justin. :-)
 
There's definitely a learning curve to it. And these hardware vendors
dragging their heels on drivers...ugh!
 
Justin said:
Thanks for the post! That goes in line with a lot of the findings here.

One question. What problems did you have with Defender?

Not sure why you turned off UAC...it's perfect! :)

Yea, if you never actually use the computer and only turn it on and let it
idle. =)

--
Stephan Rose
2003 Yamaha R6

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™ã²ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯
å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸæ™‚ãŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰
 
Justin said:
Thanks for the post! That goes in line with a lot of the findings here.

One question. What problems did you have with Defender?

No problems, per se. I just find it opaque and incomplete. I'm using
Grisoft AVG and Webroot SpySweeper, both of which give me more control and a
greater sense of security.
 
Stephan Rose said:
Yea, if you never actually use the computer and only turn it on and let it
idle. =)

Yup! That's about it! :)

No problems at all! "It Just Works"
 
PTravel said:
No problems, per se. I just find it opaque and incomplete. I'm using
Grisoft AVG and Webroot SpySweeper, both of which give me more control and
a greater sense of security.

Ah. Ok then. Thanks.
 
I use Spy Sweeper also. Maybe in about another year Windows Defender will
come up to speed. For now, I have turned off the real time scanning and just
allow it to perform a scheduled scan. Hey! It can't hurt. (-:

--


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
 
Yes sir! It uses zero resources, except when you are updating and applying
the updates. After that it sits there dumb and blind until you update/apply
again.

--


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
 
Justin said:
Thanks for the post! That goes in line with a lot of the findings here.

One question. What problems did you have with Defender?

Not sure why you turned off UAC...it's perfect! :)

UAC is fine and fairly well implemented. However, it is better for
protecting the system from standard uses than it is for an
administrator. I'm constantly tweaking my system, installing
new drivers etc. Plus, almost any current game requires administrator
permissions. I'll most likely turn it back on when we have solid
robust drivers etc.
 
UAC is fine and fairly well implemented.

You know, I really get tired of statements like this. UAC may be
well-implemented from the standpoint of a naive or unsophisticated user, but
it's a pain in the butt for someone like myself who understands what's going
on with his system and doesn't want to have to click on boxes everytime he
runs something, installs something, or want to check a system setting. UAC
is all or nothing. I'd prefer nothing.
 
PTravel said:
You know, I really get tired of statements like this. UAC may be
well-implemented from the standpoint of a naive or unsophisticated user,
but it's a pain in the butt for someone like myself who understands what's
going on with his system and doesn't want to have to click on boxes
everytime he runs something, installs something, or want to check a system
setting. UAC is all or nothing. I'd prefer nothing.

Yes, it's an abomination.

By implementing it so badly, it means many users will simply disable it and
thus any benefit it may of had will be lost.

Some simple operations take several clicks more, and other operations don't
work at all. It's disabled on my machines until it is improved...presumably
in PS1
 
No problems, per se. I just find it opaque and incomplete. I'm using
Grisoft AVG and Webroot SpySweeper, both of which give me more control and a
greater sense of security.
Symantec have just released a white paper which summed up basically
says Vista is immune to any current malware thrown at it including
Rootkits which can only be installed, PROVIDED UAC IS TURNED ON, with
user agreement.
 
Back
Top