IIS7 and .NET 3.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dylan Parry
  • Start date Start date
D

Dylan Parry

Hi,

I installed Visual Studio 2008 Express earlier today, but I am not sure
that IIS7 has been correctly configured to be able to use the 3.5 Framework.

When I look at the AppPools listed in IIS7, I see two AppPools that are
both set to use v2.0, and when attempting to create a new one, v3.5
simply isn't shown as an available Framework.

Am I missing something (ie. the plot!), or is this just how it is?

Cheers,

--
Dylan Parry
http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk

The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of
those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own.
 
When I look at the AppPools listed in IIS7, I see two AppPools that
are both set to use v2.0, and when attempting to create a new one,
v3.5 simply isn't shown as an available Framework.

Am I missing something (ie. the plot!), or is this just how it is?
Click to expand...

I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the CLR version
which is still v2.0 with the 3.5 framework.
 
Rory said:
I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the CLR version
which is still v2.0 with the 3.5 framework.
Click to expand...

Ah. Then I'm not losing the plot :) Cheers. So presumably, although I am
writing code in C# 3.0, the resulting DLL files are "ran" in the same
CLR as was installed for .NET 2.0 (and then 3.0)?

--
Dylan Parry
http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk

The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of
those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own.
 
I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the
Ah. Then I'm not losing the plot :) Cheers. So presumably, although I
am writing code in C# 3.0, the resulting DLL files are "ran" in the
same CLR as was installed for .NET 2.0 (and then 3.0)?
Click to expand...

Thats the way I understand it.

It's also this that allows you to use many of the new language features (extention
methods etc) and still target 2.0.

The exceptions to this are things like linq which require library support
as well.
 
Dylan Parry said:
Actually I meant C# 3 without the point-oh. Fingers going faster than
the brain.
Click to expand...

Some people do put the ".0" in for various versions of C#. In theory
the version of C# in VS2003 was actually 1.2, believe it or not.

Personally I like to stick to 1, 2, 3 :)
 
Jon Skeet said:
Some people do put the ".0" in for various versions of C#. In theory
the version of C# in VS2003 was actually 1.2, believe it or not.

Personally I like to stick to 1, 2, 3 :)
Click to expand...

confused here.
do we already use c# 3 (as language version) on the Orca?
 
Back
Top