B
Brian
I print a good deal of photos here at work and I am unsatisfied with
the cost and performance of our printers. Currently we have these:
Epson Stylus Photo 2000P
Epson Stylus Photo 915 and
Epson Stylus Photo 785 EPX
The 2000P is not a good printer for any practical purposes besides
archiving because it takes so damn long to print, and it barely
supports network printing and they usually don't come out right. The
785 EPX has given us so many problems that I am literally crying as I
type this. Some days I have to clean the heads 10 different times to
get a half decent print and that consumes a TON of ink. The 915 is
still pretty new and it hasn't given me much grief but it is already
starting to show signs of wear and tear.
I want to replace all of these with one printer and my budget is 2100
bucks. Ideally it would print fast photo quality prints and would
have a reputation for not breaking. A 17" paper feed wouldn't be bad,
either!
THAAANK YOU! =)
the cost and performance of our printers. Currently we have these:
Epson Stylus Photo 2000P
Epson Stylus Photo 915 and
Epson Stylus Photo 785 EPX
The 2000P is not a good printer for any practical purposes besides
archiving because it takes so damn long to print, and it barely
supports network printing and they usually don't come out right. The
785 EPX has given us so many problems that I am literally crying as I
type this. Some days I have to clean the heads 10 different times to
get a half decent print and that consumes a TON of ink. The 915 is
still pretty new and it hasn't given me much grief but it is already
starting to show signs of wear and tear.
I want to replace all of these with one printer and my budget is 2100
bucks. Ideally it would print fast photo quality prints and would
have a reputation for not breaking. A 17" paper feed wouldn't be bad,
either!
THAAANK YOU! =)