IExplore.exe-Application Error?

  • Thread starter Thread starter murray
  • Start date Start date
M

murray

Fiesta
Recently I have been constantly getting the following IE6 error message:
IEXPLORE.EXE-Application Error
The instruction at 0x10003dfb "referenced memory at 0x006e0069". The memory
could not be "written".
Click OK to terminate the program
Click on cancel to debug the program
When this occurs I have the choice of either logging off or rebooting.
Since I am not an expert in interpreting the debug messages, I can not
locate the cause from that source.
Can anyone help me. Thanks.
 
What!!! you just proved my point about dumbass& ignorant MVP's. You sound
like a drunk. If you don't know what you are talking about then butt out of
this thread. Put the bottle down ....idiot.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



THIEF!!!

IEFix (which the PCA**hole1 renamed to FixIE) is the /copyrighted/
work of MS MVP Ramesh Srinivasan!
http://windowsxp.mvps.org/IEFIX.htm
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User)
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

<snip>
 
BTW nimrod, Ramesh Srinivasan is one of the few very well respected MVP's
unlike you.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



THIEF!!!

IEFix (which the PCA**hole1 renamed to FixIE) is the /copyrighted/
work of MS MVP Ramesh Srinivasan!
http://windowsxp.mvps.org/IEFIX.htm
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User)
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

<snip>
 
In this situation I can think of three courses of action:

a) Prove that the repair tool is your own creation.
b) Agree that it was created by someone else.
c) Become abusive (which lets the reader draw his own conclusions).

The choice depends on your calibre.
 
I stand corrected: Ramesh's utility is a compiled program. I still doubt
PCButts1 wrote his as he has a long history of stealing the work of others
and calling it his own.

A colleague observes:

<QP>
The PCButts1 tool just does a quick regedit to remove any Home Page or
Search settings, and other misc. settings.

Registers a few DLLs:
regsvr32 /s urlmon.dll
regsvr32 /s Shdocvw.dll
regsvr32 /s Actxprxy.dll
regsvr32 /s Oleaut32.dll
regsvr32 /s Mshtml.dll
regsvr32 /s Browseui.dll
regsvr32 /s Shell32.dll

Then empties the TIF and %TEMP% folder.

Ramesh does a lot more than this.
</QP>

cf. http://iefaq.info/index.php?action=artikel&cat=24&id=31&artlang=en
 
Correction:
Apparently your tool does differ from Ramesh's tool.
Ramesh's is an executable file with much more functionality than the simple batch
file that comprises your utility.
 
So why the crosspost to Win98 General?

Unexplained computer behavior may be caused by deceptive software
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/827315

Run a /thorough/ check for hijackware, including posting your hijackthis log
to an appropriate forum.

Checking for/Help with Hijackware
http://aumha.org/a/parasite.htm
http://aumha.org/a/quickfix.htm
http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=5878
http://wiki.castlecops.com/Malware_Removal_and_Prevention:_Introduction
http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/unwanted.htm
http://inetexplorer.mvps.org/data/prevention.htm
http://inetexplorer.mvps.org/tshoot.html
http://www.mvps.org/sramesh2k/Malware_Defence.htm
http://defendingyourmachine2.blogspot.com/
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware

When all else fails, HijackThis v2.0.2
(http://aumha.org/downloads/hijackthis.exe) is the preferred tool to use.
It will help you to both identify and remove any hijackware/spyware with
assistance from an expert. **Post your log to
http://forums.spybot.info/forumdisplay.php?f=22,
http://castlecops.com/forum67.html,
http://forums.subratam.org/index.php?showforum=7,
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30, or other appropriate forums for expert
analysis, not here.**

If the procedures look too complex - and there is no shame in admitting this
isn't your cup of tea - take the machine to a local, reputable and
independent (i.e., not BigBoxStoreUSA) computer repair shop.
--
IE-specific newsgroup:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general

~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User)
 
To exclude individuals in other groups such as win98.gen, is kind of
snobbish (don't you think?).
No one has a monopoly on all subject knowledge.
In fact, those who started with windows 95 and migrated to Vista are
generally older and might have picked up some very useful knowledge along
the way.
I have 4 computers with Win98, Win2000 Pro,WinXP Pro and Vista Home Premium
and subscribe to all the related newsgroups. I am certainly no expert and
have quite a bit to learn but I am not ashamed to ask and listen to anyone
that might be willing to contribute.
By the way thank you for your time.
 
It makes a difference as to what fix the helpers may suggest. Solutions
for Windows 98 and Windows 2000 may differ considerably and what applies
to one OS may not apply to the other at all. It has nothing to do with
being snobbish, if you want accurate answers it is best to post to the
groups that deal with the operating system that you are dealing with, or
at the very least clearly state the operating system involved.

I know what you mean and I agree that there are some very knowledgeable
folks who only frequent select groups that can provide valuable help
about other operating systems, but at the onset you should have at least
let the helpers know that you were asking about a Windows 2000 problem,
it avoids confusion and it helps the helpers decide if they can offer
useful advice. I might be a bit upset if I were to write a lengthy post
to help you fix what I thought to be a Windows 98 problem only to have
you later come back saying that the solution doesn't work for Windows
2000, as it is you are asking about IE on Windows 2000 but you have
posted to Windows 98 and Windows XP groups, I can assure you that there
are many IE fixes that don't apply at all to Windows 2000. For example,
repairing IE on XP is completely different than repairing it on Windows
2000, you don't reinstall a Service Pack to fix IE on Windows 2000! By
posting to these different groups without clearly stating your operating
system you are only asking for trouble.

John
 
Well said, John John.

John said:
It makes a difference as to what fix the helpers may suggest. Solutions
for Windows 98 and Windows 2000 may differ considerably and what applies
to one OS may not apply to the other at all. It has nothing to do with
being snobbish, if you want accurate answers it is best to post to the
groups that deal with the operating system that you are dealing with, or
at the very least clearly state the operating system involved.

I know what you mean and I agree that there are some very knowledgeable
folks who only frequent select groups that can provide valuable help
about other operating systems, but at the onset you should have at least
let the helpers know that you were asking about a Windows 2000 problem,
it avoids confusion and it helps the helpers decide if they can offer
useful advice. I might be a bit upset if I were to write a lengthy post
to help you fix what I thought to be a Windows 98 problem only to have
you later come back saying that the solution doesn't work for Windows
2000, as it is you are asking about IE on Windows 2000 but you have
posted to Windows 98 and Windows XP groups, I can assure you that there
are many IE fixes that don't apply at all to Windows 2000. For example,
repairing IE on XP is completely different than repairing it on Windows
2000, you don't reinstall a Service Pack to fix IE on Windows 2000! By
posting to these different groups without clearly stating your operating
system you are only asking for trouble.

John
 
glee said:
Correction:
Apparently your tool does differ from Ramesh's tool.
Ramesh's is an executable file with much more functionality than the
simple batch file that comprises your utility.
Yes your right, pcbutt-head is almost banned from the internet.
He's a parasite!
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm
<Blocking Unwanted Parasites with a Hosts File>
<Now includes most major *parasites* , *hijackers* and unwanted
Adware/Spyware programs!>
127.0.0.1 pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com
127.0.0.1 www.pcbutts1.com #[Unauthorized
Downloads][SiteAdvisor.pcbutts1.com]
127.0.0.1 leythosthestalker.com
127.0.0.1 www.leythosthestalker.com
 
What are you telling me that for, I made it I know what it is and what it
does. I never made any comparison between mine and Ramesh's utility you and
the idiot PA Bear did. Next time check first before you blabber your mouth
off.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell
 
It appears my problem has been solved with your help.
By upgrading to Microsoft Office 2000 Service Release 1 (SR-1), my IExplorer
application error has disappeared.
It appears that many of the so-called experts that followed your reply
preferred to either take pot-shots at each other or lecture me on my lack of
providing specific details.
Anyway Thanks again. I really appreciated your help.
 
You're welcome murray, I'm pleased that you were able to resolve the issue
and thanks for the feedback.

Mart
 
Back
Top