Remember, please, that all of us, including MVPs, are volunteers and lead
busy lives outside of the newsgroups and forums.
I've just spent 4 days and perhaps 5-6 hours troubleshooting this problem. I
spent probably 45 minutes attempting to find out how to include a link
(in my post, specifically to save a
resonder's time by not having to search the group directly. Not that the
effort I've expended in any way justifies my expecting you to waste valuable
time, time that I might help you avoid simply by doing a better job of
documenting my question. On the contrary I appreciate the help you've (yes,
you personally) given me in the past as well as help given by other who share
their knowledge -- expert or not -- on these newgroups.
Regarding the question posted here, I truly believed (and still believe)
that referencing the original post would have been WASTING others' time, not
saving them any time. The original contained on information from anyone else,
and the information I provided there was in one form or another repeated in
my follow-up. Perhaps follow-up is the word that causing the misunderanding;
it really wasn't a follow-up, but rather a re-posting to see if someone would
take a look at it. In any event, if I am mistaken, then I hope you will
consider my error one of judgement, not one of laziness.
I spent 35+ years in "the industry" before I retired a few years ago. Most
of my expertise has vanished, or rather has lost any relevance to today's
technology. So you are correct in implying that I'm not very busy outside of
the forums, at least not busy in the sense that I have a job that I'm being
paid for and that happens to coincide well with the expertise that people are
seeking here.
So, again, I truly regret my mistake and I will make every effort not to
repeat it in the future.
PA Bear said:
No matter. Stick with your current thread. Looks like my colleague Neil's
got you pointed in the right direction.
Remember, please, that all of us, including MVPs, are volunteers and lead
busy lives outside of the newsgroups and forums.
Why didn't you post your follow-up
That post was getting no response in the WMP group. The follow-up got
several responses, one of which seems to point to a possible browser
issue.
So, I consider the original post dead. It seems to make more sense to post
the security question in the IE group.
I've looked at several flavors of that article -- wm9 wm10 wm11 and
others.
I took the steps indicated and still have the problem.
I looked randomly at several of these, nothing seemed to apply to my
situation -- or seems to offer anything new to what I've already
considered.
I then narrowed the group down using C00D1197 + msft OR mvp AND IE OR
security, which gave me 14 articles to look at. None of them helped.
----
Could adding one or more of the sites as a trusted site in IE (see the
pathnames of the http files) possibly fix the problem?
PA Bear said:
[X-post to microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player newsgroup]
Why didn't you post your follow-up
(
http://groups.google.com/group/micr...dia.player/browse_frm/thread/6c0f9a81aec1cfa2)
in a reply to the original thread
(
http://groups.google.com/group/micr...a.player/browse_frm/thread/f39857de36b288da)?
See...
Why do I get error code C00D1197 when I try to play a file on the
Internet?
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/knowledgecenter/mediaadvice/0082.mspx#EED
Also see these archived discussions:
http://groups.google.com/group/micr...ch?q=C00D1197+++msft+OR+mvp&start=0&scoring=d
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
AumHa VSOP & Admin
http://aumha.net
DTS-L
http://dts-l.net/
cellist wrote:
I've opened an issue in Windows Media Player list,
Would someone
be
able to take a look at this from the perspective of a possible IE
security
issue? Could adding one or more of the sites as a trusted site (see the
pathnames of the http files) possibly fix the problem?
