Identifying refurbished Maxtor drives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter computer stuff
  • Start date Start date
C

computer stuff

Just received a hard drive advertised as 'new' but the drive says
'Tested and Serviced to MAXTOR specifications'. Mfg.Date was
16OCT2002 and it also has R1 (N) 07FEB2004. Is it safe to assume this
is a refurbished drive that was remanufactured a month ago?

Appreciate any insight.
 
computer stuff said:
Just received a hard drive advertised as 'new' but the drive says
'Tested and Serviced to MAXTOR specifications'. Mfg.Date was
16OCT2002 and it also has R1 (N) 07FEB2004. Is it safe to assume this
is a refurbished drive that was remanufactured a month ago?

Appreciate any insight.

Yes, it's someone else's old RMA that has been repaired. I've RMA'd four
Maxtor drives over the last couple of months. 20 gig Fireball 3's for the
most part, although the last one was a 30Gb DiamondMax.
 
computer stuff said:
Just received a hard drive advertised as 'new' but the drive says
'Tested and Serviced to MAXTOR specifications'. Mfg.Date was
16OCT2002 and it also has R1 (N) 07FEB2004. Is it safe to assume this
is a refurbished drive that was remanufactured a month ago?

Appreciate any insight.

Looks like someone bought a "new" drive on eBay from HDOutlet.

Rita
 
ust received a hard drive advertised as 'new' but the drive says
'Tested and Serviced to MAXTOR specifications'. Mfg.Date was
16OCT2002 and it also has R1 (N) 07FEB2004. Is it safe to assume this
is a refurbished drive that was remanufactured a month ago?
How much did you pay for it and the size?
 
Sounds like a refurb to me, it was made 16 months ago
and as most new hard drives now only have one year warranty, it is also out
of warranty
Double check, contact Maxtor, give them the model and serial number,
see what they have to say about the drive
 
Exactly how do manufacturers refurbish HDs? What parts get replaced?

Back when WD had a user forum at their website, a WD employee wrote
that everything was replaced except for the aluminum casting, which
they said received a new organic anti-stick coating to shed dust.

But at the other extreme, I read that one company screened used HDs
that had been returned by customers, and they sent out some of them as
warranty replacements without doing any repairs to them.

Another message somewhere else said that the platters, bearings, and
seals were always replaced.
 
larrymoencurly said:
Exactly how do manufacturers refurbish HDs? What parts get replaced?

It's not unknown for manufacturers to receive equipment back that the user
says has an intermittent fault, then when they test it they can't find
anything wrong so it's marked "no-fault-found" and it gets "refurbished". I
wouldn't want to be sold one of these as new.
 
larrymoencurly said:
Exactly how do manufacturers refurbish HDs? What parts get replaced?

Presumably that varys with the manufacturer and the problem.
Back when WD had a user forum at their website,
a WD employee wrote that everything was replaced
except for the aluminum casting, which they said
received a new organic anti-stick coating to shed dust.

Sounds VERY implausible indeed when it
would be cheaper to make a new one than to get
everything out of the old one and treat it like that.
But at the other extreme, I read that one company screened used
HDs that had been returned by customers, and they sent out some
of them as warranty replacements without doing any repairs to them.

Yeah, it wouldnt be surprising if some operations did it like that
given that some returns are sure to be user stupidity or a failure
outside the hard drive. Just check that it works and ship it out again.

The big risk with that approach is that an intermittent fault
may not be seen until the second sucker gets the drive.

Stupid way to operate in my opinion.
Another message somewhere else said that the
platters, bearings, and seals were always replaced.

I find that hard to believe too, essentially because it would
cost more to do that than to have some monkey in a third
world country make a new drive on the assembly line.

Thats not to say that some operations arent that stupid tho.
 
Back
Top