P
Pop Rivet
if any of the MVPs here might have a feeling for why MS
doesn't pay attention to what I consider the more useful
bells & whistles?
I was perusing the sys32 folder the other day, looking at
the DOS programs amongst the many hundreds of files there
(XP Pro) and that occurred to me.
I am about to purchase either PM or whatever to do some
partitioning work. I have NEVER done a restore that didn't
somehow leave at least a few difficult problems laying
around afterwards, so, since this isn't a disaster recovery,
I'm not anxious to go that route.
So, why hasn't MS yet put the capability to re-partition
without losing data? Like many other things, it would make
lots of sense for them to have included such a feature in
the OS. Fdisk is a logical place to add those capabilities,
IMO. Why leave it to 3rd parties? I have lots of other
examples, but this is the one currently in my scope.
Any thoughts?
Pop
doesn't pay attention to what I consider the more useful
bells & whistles?
I was perusing the sys32 folder the other day, looking at
the DOS programs amongst the many hundreds of files there
(XP Pro) and that occurred to me.
I am about to purchase either PM or whatever to do some
partitioning work. I have NEVER done a restore that didn't
somehow leave at least a few difficult problems laying
around afterwards, so, since this isn't a disaster recovery,
I'm not anxious to go that route.
So, why hasn't MS yet put the capability to re-partition
without losing data? Like many other things, it would make
lots of sense for them to have included such a feature in
the OS. Fdisk is a logical place to add those capabilities,
IMO. Why leave it to 3rd parties? I have lots of other
examples, but this is the one currently in my scope.
Any thoughts?
Pop