Hello,
There are a good many things you do not know that would I am sure give you
pause on whether you should have made your comment at all.
There are just two folks that I take exception 2...I have no idea what you have
been told and frankly do not care as I have the experience of popejohn and his
bully boys together with the mythical people they like to quote. None of them
have stood the test of time. As for the only other person, he's a clown....one
of those people who hears one word, reads the usual toytown description of that
word and becomes an instant expert. The advice he gives is more often wrong
than right and when it is sort of right it is couched in terms and expressions
that are often not related to the subject at hand....
I will repeat the breakdown of reasons if you invite me to do so. He nor Rehan
will thank you for that of course.
In the meantime, every time He lies I will bring it to the attention of all.
(He did that at least once in an attempt to prove that he must therefore be
right....it was a situation much like the one you had with him today...it does
not matter how many times you are trying to help him, he reacts as though you
were his enemy....he did it to me several times too many). Every time he tries
to earn money by abusing his position here, I will bring THAT to the attention
of others. Every time he gives bad advice I will bring that to the attention of
others. Every time he pinches some one else's work and attempts to use that to
bolster his position, that will also be commented on and every time some one
takes advice from his website and because that advice is bad asks for more help
and instead receives a smug, "Its at your own risk" type of reply I will
comment on that too and if he pinches some one else's work and puts it on his
website that is dangerous and ill advised (remembering that a lot of people who
visit his site have below average abilities in that area and no slight is
intended their) and in particular where he has no clue about the subject matter
anyway, I will comment on that as well, and finally, if he comes any where near
the condescending attitude he sometimes displays...comment will be passed their
as well.
He makes ridiculous statements that are intended to steer people in one
particular direction (often away from a suggestion of mine), when all he
actually does is make himself...the MVP look like a total pratt...I enjoy those
times I have to admit, its all the more funny because he keeps doing it.
Check this out...this is my hard drive right now
List of the 53 most fragmented files and directories
# of Fragments File size File/Directory Name
21 56.2 MB C:\Program Files\NewsRover\Projects\723\New.rov
13 1.1 MB C:\Program Files\NeoTracePro\Data\NeoCache.ini
10 0.4 MB C:\WINDOWS\Prefetch\Layout.ini
9 0.4 MB C:\WINDOWS\PCHealth\HelpCtr\DataColl\CollectedData_3693.xml
8 0.1 MB C:\Documents and Settings\John Kelly\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
Files\Content.IE5\IN2REFG7
8 4.3 MB C:\OE\Inbox.dbx
6 0.0 MB C:\RECYCLER\S-1-5-21-2996918446-1533316248-997618623-1005\INFO2
5 0.1 MB C:\WINDOWS\PCHealth\HelpCtr\DataColl\CollectedData_3697.xml
5 0.1 MB C:\Program Files\NewsRover\Projects\6\New.rov
4 0.1 MB C:\WINDOWS\PCHealth\HelpCtr\DataColl\CollectedData_3675.xml
4 0.2 MB C:\WINDOWS\PCHealth\HelpCtr\DataColl\CollectedData_3695.xml
4 0.1 MB C:\Documents and Settings\John Kelly\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
Files\Content.IE5\4PQ7WPUV
4 0.5 MB C:\Documents and Settings\John Kelly\Local
Settings\History\History.IE5\index.dat
3 0.1
MB C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\CONFIG\security.config.cch
3 0.4 MB C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application
Data\Raxco\PerfectDisk\6.0\PerfectDisk.log
That's before I do the defragment ...waiting now for the defrag to finish. There
you go...this is after the defrag.
List of the 2 most fragmented files and directories
# of Fragments File size File/Directory Name
2 0.1 MB C:\$Secure:$SII
2 0.7 MB C:\WINDOWS\PCHealth\HelpCtr\Binaries\helpctr.exe
List of Excluded Files (Directories not included)
Reason File Name (Directories not included) Excess Fragments
Access denied C:\pagefile.sys 0
So, when a Microsoft Valued Professional in an enthusiastic way blows the thank
you I got out of the water from someone who was pleased with my suggestion,
with a remark that after MANY HOURS and when the program had finished he still
had something like THIRTY TWO THOUSAND fragments in just one of his files.
Would you think...OH perhaps the advice given was not that good then...or would
you think....don't trust these MVP's they never get it right, or would you
think if a regular caller in here...This MVP is not to be trusted
You will note the time difference between your message and my reply, obviously
it would not be that quick when running the program for the first time. I am
sure he will come up with some glib excuse...its been my experience that these
people do...but at the end of the day, would a PROFESSIONAL have submitted his
remarks in the first place?
Anyway, thanks for your input, it lacks the full true history and is correctly
worded because of that and no doubt one of HIS back channels as he likes to
call it.
I think the above covers it...I will continue to put him right and warn others
of his money making enterprises and his commercial website which is based on
flimsy non repeatable examples or simply wrong information which has been put
together by a person, in his own words, is NOT QUALIFIED TO COMMENT ON
--
Best Wishes.....John Kelly
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk
Check out free video hosting at
www.the-kellys.org
----
\|||/
(oo)
----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work
