P
philo
I recently setup and older server using RAID5 that originally had NT4 server
on it.
(Never used RAID before)
I booted from the Win2k cd. deleted all partitions...
created one 27 gig NTFS partition and installed win2k.
all went fine until the first reboot and the machine just hung.
I turned the machine off and disconnected AC power for a minute
and restarted but just got a "drive read" error.
When the machine had NT4_server on it...
I noticed that the boot partition was 2 gig FAT...
so I went back to that partitioning scheme and the install went fine.
Just for the heck of it...I disconnected the RAID array and put in a single
"ultra-wide", partitioned it all as NTFS and win2k installed just fine.
So my question is why did the RAID5 array require a FAT partition to boot?
on it.
(Never used RAID before)
I booted from the Win2k cd. deleted all partitions...
created one 27 gig NTFS partition and installed win2k.
all went fine until the first reboot and the machine just hung.
I turned the machine off and disconnected AC power for a minute
and restarted but just got a "drive read" error.
When the machine had NT4_server on it...
I noticed that the boot partition was 2 gig FAT...
so I went back to that partitioning scheme and the install went fine.
Just for the heck of it...I disconnected the RAID array and put in a single
"ultra-wide", partitioned it all as NTFS and win2k installed just fine.
So my question is why did the RAID5 array require a FAT partition to boot?