I got an HP fix kit I guess more than two years ago and it solved the
multi-feed problem completely. In the past few days the feed has again
been playing up and I'd wondered if one can use more than one kit per
printer over time, in which case I'd get another. But now, through
this thread and a forum on the HP website, I find the kit has been
discontinued just when I need one! I guess I too may need to think of
buying a new printer, have had this one for three and a half years.
If so, anyone
know a source of kits in the UK?
2. If I decide I do need to get a new printer, would it be better to
steer clear of the LaserJet 1100 (that's assuming it's still
manufactured)?
Optiker, if you got another printer, what would you go for and why?
thanks
Susie
Susie...I don't know for a fact, but it looks to me like you could probably
apply a second fix kit. In any case, if the option is to replace the whole
feed mechanism (US$75 at my local authorized HP service shop) or buy a new
one, what's to lose trying it. If you want to send me your mailing address
by private e-mail to (e-mail address removed), I'd be happy to send along
one of the two spares I now have. A generous reader of this group sent me
four he had and didn't need, and I'd be happy to pass on the favor by
sending you one of the spares to try. Or, you might post a new message here
and ask if anybody in the UK might have a spare they'd pass on to you.
The 1100 is no longer manufactured. The current generation of LaserJets
that are in the same price range include the LJ1012, at US$200 or the
LJ1300 at US$400. I paid US$400 when I bought my 1100 and from the
numbering and appearance, I'd guess the 1300 is the successor of the 1100,
but the 1020 is half the price, and for a home printer, might be the better
option. Personally, if I was to replace mine, I'm strongly motivated to
avoid HP due to the poor customer service I've received on not only this
printer, but on other printers in the past (DeskJet inkjet printers) and a
HP scanner that I replaced with an Epson. I have somen HP periphs at work,
but even including those, I don't remember the last time that I recieved
the level of customer service I think acceptable - it's been years. I'm
sure they doi better with hardware still in warranty, but they are very
quick to abandon the buyer whose equipment is out of warranty, or sock them
with hefty fees for out-of-warranty service.
The gentleman who sent me the repair kits works for Xerox and said he used
his employee discount to buy his daughter a low-cost Xerox laser printer
when she went off to college and he is pleased with it. You might check
their line.
I checked the latest reviews and the HP LJ1300 was rated only "fair" with a
numerical score of 6.7 in July 2003 by PC Magazine, whereas its apparent
predecessor, the LJ1200, recieved the third highest ranking at "very good",
a score of 8.0, in its March 2001 review. Doesn't speak well for the
LJ1300. Of the other relatively new printers, the Minolta-QMS PagePro 1250W
received a "good" at 7.6 and ranked 8th in its April 03 review.
I also checked PC World Online, which I personally feel may be a bit less
biased towards HP than PC Mag. In their "Top 10 Laser Printers" listing,
they rank the Minolta 1250W first as a "best buy" and the HP LJ1300 second.
The downside of the Minolta may be that it's a "Windows-only" printer,
meaning that it has no processor, but uses your computer's processor. My
experience with that with my current HP 720 DeskJet inkjet printer is that
it's a pain! It's difficult to work on the computer and print at the same
time because both want the CPU's attention. However, the Minolta has a low
street price of around US$170.
The only other one that PC World ranked almost as high as the Minolta and
HP was the 3rd ranked Brother HL-5040, US$299 list, low street price of
US$195. It's drawback was that it was slowest of the printers listed.
Dell is now selling a laser printer that ranked just behind the Brother,
and its list price from Dell is US$249, but currently on special at US$224.
It's score wasn't as high as the top three, but looked like it might be an
option.
Bottom line is, if I replace the 1100, I'm not sure what I'll get. I'm
toying with setting up a second, older computer as a kind of printer server
and put my HP 720 inkjet on it, and then go for the Minolta and put it on
the second computer - poor solution with some complications, but might be
the best low-cost option I can come up with.
However, after initial tests resulted in one two-page feed during the
second pass of a duplex job, I haven't had another problem with the repair
kit, other than with some fairly heavy paper - 90lb. That means that for
practical purposes, I may get more mileage out of my 1100 and not ahve to
make the decision of a replacement at this time. I have over 30,000 pages
on the printer, so it has a right to be starting to get tired, but I'll
take any number of additional pages as long as I can get them. It has been
a faithful workhorse until the multifeed problem came up.
More than you ever wanted...I'm sure...Optiker