E
Ed Connors
Deskjet 855C with bidirectional cable on LPT1 with Windows ME has
begun to malfunction during a print session. The printhead and paper
transport go in spurts with regular pauses of 8 to 9 seconds..
When Deskjet 855C is powered down and detached from AC power cable and
data cable, and restarted without connecting the data cable, the slow
behavior also occurs during self-test on this printer. The self-test
pages (i.e., data from ROM in the printer) are printed just as slowly.
So, this seems to be a printer firmware problem.
The behavior is the same, whether I indicate "default" properties and
launch a "print" test either thru Windows ME, or else thru HP DJCP
loaded in a DOS shell.
"Removing" and "adding" the Windows ME LPT1 driver did not overcome
it.
After DJCP exits and DOS shell exits, there is an ERRORLOG.TXT file:
"Error in transport close -- 78" in the DJCP directory. What does that
code mean?
Did the code 78 come from the 855C printer or from DJCP or WinME?
Does anyone have a possible solution to restore the printing rate to
"normal"?
-- E Connors
begun to malfunction during a print session. The printhead and paper
transport go in spurts with regular pauses of 8 to 9 seconds..
When Deskjet 855C is powered down and detached from AC power cable and
data cable, and restarted without connecting the data cable, the slow
behavior also occurs during self-test on this printer. The self-test
pages (i.e., data from ROM in the printer) are printed just as slowly.
So, this seems to be a printer firmware problem.
The behavior is the same, whether I indicate "default" properties and
launch a "print" test either thru Windows ME, or else thru HP DJCP
loaded in a DOS shell.
"Removing" and "adding" the Windows ME LPT1 driver did not overcome
it.
After DJCP exits and DOS shell exits, there is an ERRORLOG.TXT file:
"Error in transport close -- 78" in the DJCP directory. What does that
code mean?
Did the code 78 come from the 855C printer or from DJCP or WinME?
Does anyone have a possible solution to restore the printing rate to
"normal"?
-- E Connors