measekite said:
WIN 98 IS CRAP. IF YOU COMPUTER CANNOT AT LEAST RUN WIN2K THEN JUNK THE
ARCHAIC TRASH.
(sigh)
Ifyou knew anything about the real world you would know that there are some
environments where Win2K, WinXP and NT simply do not work. For these
environments Win98 or Win98SE is the only viable operating system. So whether
Win98 is a good or bad operating system is irrelevent, it is sometimes the only
option and has nothing at all to do with the processing capability of the
hardware.
One obvious example of this is the billions of dollars in investment in
commercial and industrial computerised equipment (often highly specialised)
that was designed for Win98 and is still performing perfectly. Are you
seriously suggesting that these stable and efficient pieces of hardware should
be scrapped or that the owners should pay for an application and/or hardware
development for a newer OS that would provide them with no improvements (they
generally will not run in compatibility mode and why bother anyway?). Some of
this equipment still uses Win95 and in their environment it is 100% stable.
You have no idea why the OP needs Win98, you have made another false
assumption. You also have no intention of actually trying to help anyone, right?
Maybe you should make a New Year's resolution to use your brain or do some
research before engaging your left index finger (reference: Old Asian custom).
Tony
<snip>