I was not suggesting that you substitute "etc." for "et al." My point was
that "et al." is a common abbreviation in English, just as common as "etc."
and consequently does not need to be italicized. I would have thought that
someone who is earning a Ph.D. (in any subject) would be a better reader.
I would also hope that a doctoral candidate would have a better
understanding of the use of "et al." than "The usual practice is to put 'et
al' for quoting other people's works." The correct use of "et al." (again,
note the required period; the phrase is an abbreviation of "et alii,"
meaning "and others") is as a substitute for the names of additional authors
when there are more than a prescribed number (the number varying depending
on the style you are following). Generally, up to three authors are named in
full; when there are four or more, "et al." comes into play.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.