How many people know this about Vista?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yuhong
  • Start date Start date
Y

yuhong

From http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=193#body:
"I think the most disappointing thing for me is that part of me wants
to like Vista, because there are a lot of interesting APIs and kernel
features that really do improve system performance and make it easier
to write for Windows"
Many of them even work on older computers, and I doubt these features
are why Vista is bloated. That is why I suggested trimming down Vista
once.
 
yuhong said:
From http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=193#body:
"I think the most disappointing thing for me is that part of me wants
to like Vista, because there are a lot of interesting APIs and kernel
features that really do improve system performance and make it easier
to write for Windows"
Many of them even work on older computers, and I doubt these features
are why Vista is bloated. That is why I suggested trimming down Vista
once.

How Many People Know About Vista? I Would Say About 5,000. Maybe More.
Just FYI
 
From http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=193#body:
"I think the most disappointing thing for me is that part of me wants
to like Vista, because there are a lot of interesting APIs and kernel
features that really do improve system performance and make it easier
to write for Windows"
Many of them even work on older computers, and I doubt these features
are why Vista is bloated. That is why I suggested trimming down Vista
once.

The main thing you need to know about Vista is that it is poorly
written. A time honored tradition that goes back to the first version
of Windows. Vista is the classic example of bloatware. Millions of
lines of code much of which are unneccessary or poorly intergrated.

Take one example most are familar with; Windows Explorer. It is
sluggish, painfully slow and redundant.
 
Hello,

I am a doctor. How long have you been having these delusions that there are
imposters lurking around?

This is a forum and there are just posts here. There have never been
imposters lurking around these forums. If you wish, we could set up some
sessions and you could come in and we could talk over your mental problems.

Please let me know,

I do care,

Thank you,

The Pyschiatrist
 
The main thing you need to know about Vista is that it is poorly
written. A time honored tradition that goes back to the first version
of Windows. Vista is the classic example of bloatware. Millions of
lines of code much of which are unneccessary or poorly intergrated.

Take one example most are familar with; Windows Explorer. It is
sluggish, painfully slow and redundant.

I would not go that far
 
From http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=193#body:
"I think the most disappointing thing for me is that part of me wants
to like Vista, because there are a lot of interesting APIs and kernel
features that really do improve system performance and make it easier
to write for Windows"
Many of them even work on older computers, and I doubt these features
are why Vista is bloated. That is why I suggested trimming down Vista
once.


The bloat is really apparent if an XP machine is "upgraded" to Vista
which I would not recommend. But buying a new machine with Vista
installed, it is fine. What is sad is that Microsoft puts out an O/S
that will run on only a small percentage of PCs. It is unfortunate
there is not a "Vista Lite."
 
Rich said:
He has no where else to go.

Rich

And... bloatware is in the eye of the beholder... both OS X 10.5.2 and
Ubuntu 7.10 have more files in their system directories than Vista.

Lang
 
You're the queen of all the village idiots...LOL!
Frank

Interesting choice of words. Clearly the person Frank is responding to
is male, yet Frank makes a reference to queen.

Is Frank a closet homosexual?

Is Frank looking for a public bathroom encounter at his local airport?

Is Frank a hermaphrodite?

Is Frank even human?

Inquiring minds want to know.

One thing for sure, Frank continues to claim his undisputed title as
this newsgroup resident main buffoon. What Frank is most proud of.
 
Lang Murphy said:
And... bloatware is in the eye of the beholder... both OS X 10.5.2 and
Ubuntu 7.10 have more files in their system directories than Vista.

Lang

But Ubuntu still fits on a CD, where as Vista needs a DVD.

Ubuntu is much tighter code base and optimization as always been one of the
key driving forces in its development.
 
Canuck57 said:
But Ubuntu still fits on a CD, where as Vista needs a DVD.

Ubuntu is much tighter code base and optimization as always been one of the
key driving forces in its development.
It's worthless, well free...and useless...won't run any of the most
popular software used today.
Frank
 
Back
Top