G
Glen A Stromquist
I salvaged a SCSI 4C scanner from the retired bin and hooked it up
awhile ago. I've never used a desktop scanner a lot previously, but this
does seem to have fairly decent output, even when I increase a 4x6 photo
to 200% it is plenty good enough to display on a monitor for a slide
show. I am using HP's latest software for this scanner, the output is
noticeable better than XP's built in program.
What I am wondering is how does this behometh stack up against its new,
very compact competitors that sell around $100? Is the output from them
equal/better or does one have to spend a few more sheckels than this?
I have also downloaded a trial version of vuescan to try with both this
and my Nikon ls-2000, but the factory software seems pretty adequate at
this point, is Vuescan worth paying the $$ for?
TIA
awhile ago. I've never used a desktop scanner a lot previously, but this
does seem to have fairly decent output, even when I increase a 4x6 photo
to 200% it is plenty good enough to display on a monitor for a slide
show. I am using HP's latest software for this scanner, the output is
noticeable better than XP's built in program.
What I am wondering is how does this behometh stack up against its new,
very compact competitors that sell around $100? Is the output from them
equal/better or does one have to spend a few more sheckels than this?
I have also downloaded a trial version of vuescan to try with both this
and my Nikon ls-2000, but the factory software seems pretty adequate at
this point, is Vuescan worth paying the $$ for?
TIA