Categorize your contacts. You can use multiple categories for every contact. Then display your contacts by category.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Greg S asked:
| Thanks for the info. I certainly hope that someone at Microsoft can
| see how important search the notes field is!! I live by that
| function. My entire contact list revolves around the fact that I can
| search all fields, especially the notes. I'm glad to know that there
| is at least one pain in the butt way to seach it, but I certainly
| hope they add the notes field to the list of indexed fields!! Does
| any one else know of a way to make it happen??
|
| "LongtimeUser" wrote:
|
|| Outlook 2007 has a similar option to rhodes2010's: Select the
|| Contacts folder, then Tools - Instant Search - Advanced Find, then
|| the Advanced tab, Fields -> pick 'Notes' in list, etc. This is a
|| pale shadow compared to the convenience of instant-searching all the
|| data in the Contacts table views directly. Perhaps the default
|| instant-search in Contacts table views should be on structured
|| fields (as it is now), but then the expanded instant-search query
|| builder can be used to *widen* the search to Notes, attachments,
|| etc. This would be a little counter-intuitive for some at first
|| (since the query builder is normally used to *narrow* the search),
|| but would be most useful - perhaps could have some indicator on the
|| 'Notes' field in query builder to show that this will widen instead
|| of narrow the search. I hope that the gentle soul in India is still
|| listening.
||
|| "dickmill" wrote:
||
||| Julie -- I put up the post 2 below yours and have just answered
||| Jason in the post below yours -- same problem apparently. The post
||| to this thread by rhodes2010 sounds like he's not using Outlook
||| 2007, but an earlier Outlook version. I mentioned that MSFT has not
||| been able to provide an answer, but a gentle soul in India has
||| promised to look into it further. I suspect that it's a regression
||| from past versions.