Hey Jim,
Cool, you not only cloaked your email addy but you also managed to insult me
2 times in one message! lol
- "you have a reading disability": nope, just a typing disability since I
managed to make TWO typos in ONE mail! What I meant was: "AFAICT there is no
way to do that in OL2000, ar am I missing something?" I did not mean OE2000,
that was merely a typo (yes, <red face>twice</red face>).
- "I can read quite well thank you": when I wrote "Please read:" I was not
implying you cannot read, I was impying "I should have written:"
- "you need a basic education in ... talked about it": first insult, can't
really comment on that one, the only thing I can say is I'm one of the few
people in this ng, like yourself, that posts more replies than questions.
That does say something about courtesy: I try to help others where I can.
That in a way is courtesy since I don't HAVE to do that, right?
- "Ignore forver more this jerk.": second insult but Frank already told you
he wrote that himself, not me.
Sooooooo, my question still isn't solved! lol Replying to a msg in OE6 can
always be plain text but you can't do that in OL(2K). Am I right or am I
right?
;-)
-----------------
"Jim Pickering"
<jimp@mvps.org> wrote in
message *You* need to learn how to read. As I stated:
"First, there is no Outlook Express 2000"
And in case you have a reading disability, that also means there is no
OE2000. I can read quite well thank you. And I think you need a basic
education in courtesy since you obviously were asleep when either your
parents or teachers talked about it.
Your nasty remarks to Frank Saunders were also uncalled for and have just
earned you a spot on a preciously short list of mine, called "Ignore forver
more this jerk." Goodbye and have a nice life.