"give" , my fingers are too width this morning.
in message | Just to gibe proper credit, Patrick Norton and Leo LaPorte
| used the "tear out the table of contents" line on the
| SCREENSAVER TV show (
www.techtv.com ) the other day.
|
|
| | | Hi, Charlie and Grace.
| |
| | It's hard to find analogies in our non-computer world,
| although Jim
| | Macklin's "tear out the table of contents but leave the
| contents" comparison
| | to a book comes close. The hurdle is that data is
stored
| on our hard drives
| | electromagnetically. Each bit on the drive can be a one
| or a zero. In
| | fact, it MUST be a one or a zero, it can't simply be
blank
| or nothing. So,
| | we can't really "erase" a bit, we can only change it
from
| a one to a zero,
| | or vice versa.
| |
| | On a school blackboard, we could erase and rewrite
| innumerable times. On a
| | hard drive, we can't really erase; we just rewrite,
| replacing the old data
| | as we go. The closest we can come to erasure is to
write
| zeros (or ones, or
| | something meaningless) over all the bits that we want to
| hide.
| |
| | When we tell the computer to erase a file, it simply
| removes the directory
| | entry so that the file can no longer be found by normal
| means, and it marks
| | the table of available disk space to show that the space
| this file uses (and
| | where it continues to reside) is now available to be
| overwritten by whatever
| | we decide to put there. So, the next file to be stored
| just might get
| | written over the top of the "erased" file. But, if we
| have plenty of
| | available space and/or don't store very much new data,
the
| "erased" file may
| | not get overwritten for days - or years.
| |
| | Disk Editor utilities are scarce these days, but they
were
| pretty common a
| | decade or two ago. Peter Norton got his start with the
| Norton Utilities;
| | two of the main utilities were Unerase and DiskEdit.
| Symantec bought the
| | software and the name. They have updated some of the
old
| and have written
| | new utilities to fit current computer problems
(firewall,
| antivirus, etc.),
| | but it's pretty hard to find a modern equivalent of
| DiskEdit in your local
| | Best Buy.
| |
| | With DiskEdit, we could look at our hard disk's sectors
| and clusters,
| | ignoring the file system when we chose. We could see
the
| bits and bytes of
| | data, plus the bits and bytes of the directory, FAT,
boot
| sector, partition
| | table and other disk management structures. It was easy
| to see and read all
| | of our "erased" data that had not yet been overwritten.
| We could see
| | several copies of some files (letters to our Mom?) as we
| had saved
| | successive revisions while drafting them. We could see
| last year's
| | long-forgotten memos. And we could see our supersecret
| data that had been
| | deleted long ago. Anybody with similar software could
| have seen the same
| | things, if they had access to our disks.
| |
| | Disk editor programs are not popular enough for most
| software sellers to
| | bother to stock them, but they are readily available if
| you want them. They
| | are valuable diagnostic and repair tools, so any good
| computer repair shop
| | will use them and may sell them. And, of course, law
| enforcement agencies
| | have them.
| |
| | Fortunately, the crooks don't usually bother to learn
this
| much about
| | computers. When the cops find their "clean" hard
drives,
| all the data is
| | there for the easy finding.
| |
| | RC
| | --
| | R. C. White, CPA
| | San Marcos, TX
| | (e-mail address removed)
| | Microsoft Windows MVP
| |
| | | | > I read sometimes where the F.B.I. wil go into
someone's
| home to look into
| | > their computer. If this person who they are
| investigating is carefully
| | > deleting things as he goes along how can the F.B.I.
find
| things on this
| | > persons computer? I mean arn't these people who are
| doing big time crimes
| | > smart enough to erase things?
| |
| |
|
|