B
Brian Anderson
I have a win2k terminal server I have a few specific settings on,
namely, removing shut down from the start menu, adding log off, and
making the C:\ drive inaccessible on the machine. I have two remote
stores that are dependent on terminal services, as well as a few local
users who use terminal services for various reasons. So what I think I
need is a loopback policy on the terminal server to make sure any local
user who logs on has the shut down removed from the start on the
terminal server, but when on their local machine shut down is present.
I think this is the "replace" option. Question is, how do I set this
up so my user has the shut down option when logged on? I want to be
able to remotely control and shut down/reboot the machine if necessary.
If I'm using the GPMC, do I place my user name in the Delegation Tab >
Advanced button > Security setting with a deny to "apply Group Policy"?
Also, if the Terminal Server is in its own OU, all GPO's with user
configuration settings in that OU are applied via the loopback policy,
correct?
Thanks!
Brian
namely, removing shut down from the start menu, adding log off, and
making the C:\ drive inaccessible on the machine. I have two remote
stores that are dependent on terminal services, as well as a few local
users who use terminal services for various reasons. So what I think I
need is a loopback policy on the terminal server to make sure any local
user who logs on has the shut down removed from the start on the
terminal server, but when on their local machine shut down is present.
I think this is the "replace" option. Question is, how do I set this
up so my user has the shut down option when logged on? I want to be
able to remotely control and shut down/reboot the machine if necessary.
If I'm using the GPMC, do I place my user name in the Delegation Tab >
Advanced button > Security setting with a deny to "apply Group Policy"?
Also, if the Terminal Server is in its own OU, all GPO's with user
configuration settings in that OU are applied via the loopback policy,
correct?
Thanks!
Brian