G
Guest
Despite being a Windows/Linux programmer, I've never had any dealings with XP
embedded before.We are developing a system which has to be SIL2 compliant
(European standard for safety related systems). For the most critical
applications we have to use Linux, but for the less critical we can use XP -
but in limited ways. Because of this, XP Embedded seems the best option as we
can cut out the stuff we don't need, like Media Player, MSN messenger, etc.
This system consists of several PCs networked in a closed environment (ie no
network connections to anything else). Some will be locked in an equipment
room with no keyboard, mouse, or video. We're actually thinking of running
the software as a service in some cases. One PC does need to have a user
interface though. Hardware requirements are minimal - this isn't a server.
Installation in this way does mean that the online registration of Windows
will NOT be possible - and I hate the telephone version which takes ages and
is prone to human error, so any legal way around this would be a benefit.
Windows critical updates are not necessary - and in fact would be a menace on
SIL2 systems.
Firstly, is XP Embedded the way to go?
Secondly, I've downloaded the trial version and had a play. It *looks* like
this is the right thing, but when I came to burn an image to install on
another PC, I found I needed a 2nd hard drive... why?
So I did a bit of searching and found that you need Windows PE. XP Embedded
doesn't mention this at all (well, not in the bits I've read). So now I'm
confused! Also, PE doesn't seem to have a trial version, which makes
trialling Embedded somewhat difficult!
Although I've read the MSDN articles on Embedded, I'm none the wiser. It
assumes a level of knowledge which I don't have. So if you can point me to
any "dummy's guides", I'd be grateful!
Many thanks
Geoff M.
embedded before.We are developing a system which has to be SIL2 compliant
(European standard for safety related systems). For the most critical
applications we have to use Linux, but for the less critical we can use XP -
but in limited ways. Because of this, XP Embedded seems the best option as we
can cut out the stuff we don't need, like Media Player, MSN messenger, etc.
This system consists of several PCs networked in a closed environment (ie no
network connections to anything else). Some will be locked in an equipment
room with no keyboard, mouse, or video. We're actually thinking of running
the software as a service in some cases. One PC does need to have a user
interface though. Hardware requirements are minimal - this isn't a server.
Installation in this way does mean that the online registration of Windows
will NOT be possible - and I hate the telephone version which takes ages and
is prone to human error, so any legal way around this would be a benefit.
Windows critical updates are not necessary - and in fact would be a menace on
SIL2 systems.
Firstly, is XP Embedded the way to go?
Secondly, I've downloaded the trial version and had a play. It *looks* like
this is the right thing, but when I came to burn an image to install on
another PC, I found I needed a 2nd hard drive... why?
So I did a bit of searching and found that you need Windows PE. XP Embedded
doesn't mention this at all (well, not in the bits I've read). So now I'm
confused! Also, PE doesn't seem to have a trial version, which makes
trialling Embedded somewhat difficult!
Although I've read the MSDN articles on Embedded, I'm none the wiser. It
assumes a level of knowledge which I don't have. So if you can point me to
any "dummy's guides", I'd be grateful!
Many thanks
Geoff M.