I
Isaac Kuo
The short version:
Does anyone know a DVD player program much faster than PowerDVD?
I'm suffering choppy 4-8fps playback with PowerDVD.
Thanks!
Isaac Kuo
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The long version:
I'm using an PIII550 Win98 box with ATI Radeon 7200 and
Powerstrip feeding a 4:3 Mistubishi HD set. It took me several
days of frustrating trial and error and internet reading, but I
finally have gotten multiple resolutions to work:
640x480p with 540p timings -- good for 640x480 videos
1280x960i with 1080i timings -- good for viewing pictures
720x480p with 540p timings -- good for 4:3 DVDs
720x720i with 1080i timings -- will be good for anamorphic DVDs
I use the following programs for videos:
Windows Media Player -- .avi and .wmv videos
mplayer (a linux port) -- .avi and .ogm videos
PowerDVD -- DVDs
My problem is with video playback on the interlaced resolutions.
With video hardware acceleration set to the 3rd or 4th notches,
all video playback is stretched vertically by a factor of 2x so
that only the top half of the video shows. This is obviously
unusable.
With hardware acceleration set to the 1st or 2nd notches, then
video playback is correct for mplayer and PowerDVD, but extremely
sluggish. Video playback for Windows Media Player is always 100%
scale, in the lower left corner.
I'm really only concerned with getting DVD playback to work with
interlaced resolutions. With my particular TV, the unusual
letterboxed 720x720i resolution will provide me with
the best anamorphic movie playback. However, without hardware
acceleration it's too choppy. Thus, my options are:
1. Get hardware acceleration to work - Is there a way to do this?
I've tried fiddling with various switches on OpenGL and Direct3D
settings and none of these seem to have any effect. There are
a number of settings in Powerstrip which I don't understand. I
tried switching some of them but so far nothing seems to work.
I'm guessing that whatever hardware function is being used to
scale the video is some sort of "overlay" function. Thus, the
program decodes the video to a piece of video memory at the
original resolution and the video card scales this image to
the desired size on the fly while displaying it. Is that right?
I guess that whatever the video card is doing it's incrementing
by only half as much as it's supposed to on each scanline,
because it's interlaced. Is there some sort of hack to get it
to work properly on interlaced resolutions?
2. Get a more efficient DVD playing program - I use PowerDVD simply
because that's what came with my DVD drive. Any suggestions
for better DVD playback software?
3. Tweak PowerDVD - is this even possible? I've probably overlooked
options which could make it play back faster. However, I
somehow doubt minor tweaks could get it up to speed. Playback
without hardware acceleration is very choppy, varying between
around 4 to 8 frames per second. A tweak which increased speed
by 25% would still be too slow.
4. Get a faster processor - but no one has PIII's any more and
upgrading to a PIV motherboard along with new memory is too
expensive. Also, my motherboard might not support PIII's
faster than 600mhz anyway.
I thank you for your time reading the long version, and would
appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks!
Isaac Kuo
Does anyone know a DVD player program much faster than PowerDVD?
I'm suffering choppy 4-8fps playback with PowerDVD.
Thanks!
Isaac Kuo
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The long version:
I'm using an PIII550 Win98 box with ATI Radeon 7200 and
Powerstrip feeding a 4:3 Mistubishi HD set. It took me several
days of frustrating trial and error and internet reading, but I
finally have gotten multiple resolutions to work:
640x480p with 540p timings -- good for 640x480 videos
1280x960i with 1080i timings -- good for viewing pictures
720x480p with 540p timings -- good for 4:3 DVDs
720x720i with 1080i timings -- will be good for anamorphic DVDs
I use the following programs for videos:
Windows Media Player -- .avi and .wmv videos
mplayer (a linux port) -- .avi and .ogm videos
PowerDVD -- DVDs
My problem is with video playback on the interlaced resolutions.
With video hardware acceleration set to the 3rd or 4th notches,
all video playback is stretched vertically by a factor of 2x so
that only the top half of the video shows. This is obviously
unusable.
With hardware acceleration set to the 1st or 2nd notches, then
video playback is correct for mplayer and PowerDVD, but extremely
sluggish. Video playback for Windows Media Player is always 100%
scale, in the lower left corner.
I'm really only concerned with getting DVD playback to work with
interlaced resolutions. With my particular TV, the unusual
letterboxed 720x720i resolution will provide me with
the best anamorphic movie playback. However, without hardware
acceleration it's too choppy. Thus, my options are:
1. Get hardware acceleration to work - Is there a way to do this?
I've tried fiddling with various switches on OpenGL and Direct3D
settings and none of these seem to have any effect. There are
a number of settings in Powerstrip which I don't understand. I
tried switching some of them but so far nothing seems to work.
I'm guessing that whatever hardware function is being used to
scale the video is some sort of "overlay" function. Thus, the
program decodes the video to a piece of video memory at the
original resolution and the video card scales this image to
the desired size on the fly while displaying it. Is that right?
I guess that whatever the video card is doing it's incrementing
by only half as much as it's supposed to on each scanline,
because it's interlaced. Is there some sort of hack to get it
to work properly on interlaced resolutions?
2. Get a more efficient DVD playing program - I use PowerDVD simply
because that's what came with my DVD drive. Any suggestions
for better DVD playback software?
3. Tweak PowerDVD - is this even possible? I've probably overlooked
options which could make it play back faster. However, I
somehow doubt minor tweaks could get it up to speed. Playback
without hardware acceleration is very choppy, varying between
around 4 to 8 frames per second. A tweak which increased speed
by 25% would still be too slow.
4. Get a faster processor - but no one has PIII's any more and
upgrading to a PIV motherboard along with new memory is too
expensive. Also, my motherboard might not support PIII's
faster than 600mhz anyway.
I thank you for your time reading the long version, and would
appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks!
Isaac Kuo