Thanks for the reply, kony
Your point about the dress of the ribbon cables is well taken, kony. I'll
certainly clean things up in there before it's buttoned up permanently.
(As if ANYTHING to do with computers is ever permanent...)
And yes, it is truly a generic el cheapo case - $39.
I'm sorry I wasn't clear in exactly what I needed previously.
The upper drive is in the exact position that it has to be. Even 2mm
further forward, it butts against the front of the case. Retracted back
(as in the lower drive) so mounting holes line up with the slots, it
overhangs the motherboard, and interferes with IDE connector, CMOS battery,
etc. (I had the IDE cables pulled to take this pic.) Is this the "rock
and a hard place" I hear so much about?
The case is designed for the top drive to be mounted such
that it is back, interfering with the IDE/CMOS/etc. Does it
simply block access or would the two be trying to occupy the
same physical space thus it's impossible?
Often, generic cases are shallower and not so accomodating
to wide, full-featured motherboards. Unfortuately with the
design of the case front intake vents, you can't even move
the lower drive down another bay-slot without it starving
airflow across the drive circuit board.
I can drill a hole and use a regular HDD mounting screw. No problem.
If all else fails, I'd do that. Actually I might go ahead
and do that more quickly than many would, but of course
there are the issues of making sure ALL of the metal debris
from the drilling are removed, and often that can require
stripping the system down ("maybe" not for just a few small
holes but that's your call and risk to make).
I still envisage some sort of proprietary mounting fastener that's used for
mounting the drive through that keyhole-shaped dimple, though - something
that doesn't involve a screwdriver, even, that you'd just push in & turn -
the kind of thing that would save a manufacturer 2 minutes on an assembly-
line.
Those keyhole-shaped dimples are curious, if the bays were
wide enough that rails were used on the sides of the drives
then their function would seem more obvious. I'd wonder if
the orignal designer had envisioned some kind of rubber
shock-absorbing mount but then the budget cut that feature
and they didn't bother to redesign it without these
indentations, and indeed, leaving indentations of "some"
kind in metal does give it more rigidity.