Hardware upgrades

  • Thread starter Thread starter KK
  • Start date Start date
K

KK

I have a Compaq Presario about 3 yrs old, Pentium 4 (2.5 Ghz), 512Mb DDR,
80Gb hard disk, and 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared video memory'.

I'm thinking of upgrading the hardware. I assume I can install a faster
processor & more RAM. I don't need a bigger disk.

But what is meant by 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared video memory',
and can this be upgraded ?

Thanks

KK
 
Comments in-line:

KK said:
I have a Compaq Presario about 3 yrs old, Pentium 4 (2.5 Ghz), 512Mb DDR,
80Gb hard disk, and 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared video memory'.

I'm thinking of upgrading the hardware.

<snip> I assume I can install a faster processor <snip>
Possibly; it depends upon what your motherboard supports. Refer to your
COMPAQ documentation for a definitive answer.

In the world of processors, however, you have an obsolete motherboard. You
are likely to be shopping in the world of used parts in order to find a
processor.

Note that any processor "upgrade" that you effect will NOT provide a
noticeable difference to your computing experience.

<snip> & more RAM. <snip>
Whether or not your system supports greater than 512 MB memory is, again,
dependent upon what your motherboard supports. Refer to your COMPAQ
documentation for a definitive answer.

and can this be upgraded ? <snip>
As stated, your computer has "512Mb DDR" of memory. Your computer has an
integrated, or "built-in" video "card" which, rather than having its own
memory, uses (up to) 64 MB of that 512Mb of memory. Your System memory is
reduced accordingly, to a minimum of 448 MB.

The amount of memory assigned to video can be adjusted in your system BIOS.
Refer to your COMPAQ documentation for instructions on how to enter the BIOS
and how to ajustment the amount of memory assigned to the graphics
sub-system.
Thanks

KK
Hope this helps,
Steve
 
KK said:
I have a Compaq Presario about 3 yrs old, Pentium 4 (2.5 Ghz), 512Mb DDR,
80Gb hard disk, and 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared video memory'.

I'm thinking of upgrading the hardware. I assume I can install a faster
processor & more RAM. I don't need a bigger disk.

But what is meant by 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared video memory',
and can this be upgraded ?

Thanks

KK

Upgrading an OEM-built computer system such as a Compaq has
limited returns. There are proprietary components, and the
"integrated graphics" is an example of the video card using
the computer's RAM instead of video RAM. While adding RAM
would be helpful to an older system such as this one, the
route to a faster processor would be, with today's offerings,
a completely new system. Three years is a pretty good life
time for any computer.
 
KK said:
I have a Compaq Presario about 3 yrs old, Pentium 4 (2.5 Ghz), 512Mb
DDR, 80Gb hard disk, and 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared
video memory'.
I'm thinking of upgrading the hardware.


Why? Are you unhappy with the computer's performance? Has the poor
performance always been there or is it something new? If the latter, it is
very likely attributable to something other than hardware, and upgrading may
not help you at all.


I assume I can install a
faster processor


Maybe, maybe not. It depends on what your motherboard can support.

& more RAM.


Again, maybe or maybe not; it too depends on what you motherboard can
support.

Over and above that, what makes you thing more RAM will improve anything?
You often see advice telling you the more RAM the better, but that is *not*
accurate.

The issue is with the page file. If you don't have enough RAM, the operating
system will use the page file to supplement your RAM, and the page file
exists on your harddrive. Reading and wring from the page file on the hard
drive is a mechanical process, unlike the electronic one of reading and
writing to RAM, and is many times slower. So if you don't have enough RAM to
keep you from using the page file, the extra hard drive access slows the
system down. If you are in that situation, more RAM will improve
performance.

But do not assume you are in that situation. In fact, with 512MB, most
people will *not* be in that situation. Most people running a typical range
of business applications find that somewhere around 256-384MB works well,
others need 512MB. Almost anyone will see poor performance with less than
256MB. Some people, particularly those doing things like editing large
photographic images, can see a performance boost by adding even more than
512MB--sometimes much more.

If you are currently using the page file significantly, more memory will
decrease or eliminate that usage, and improve your performance. If you are
not using the page file significantly, more memory will do nothing for you.
Go to http://billsway.com/notes_public/winxp_tweaks/ and download
WinXP-2K_Pagefile.zip and monitor your pagefile usage. That should give you
a good idea of whether more memory can help, and if so, how much more.

I don't need a bigger disk.

But what is meant by 'Integrated Graphics, up to 64 Mb shared video
memory',


It means that you don't have a separate video card, but that your
motherboard has video-card-like circuitry built into it. It also means that,
since you don't have a separate video card, there is no separate video
memory, and 64MB of your 512MB is "stolen" for that purpose,

So effectively, you don't have 512MB of RAM, but only 448MB. But even 448MB
is enough for most people who don't run especially demanding apps.

and can this be upgraded ?


Not directly, but you can buy a separate video card, install it and disable
the motherboard video support. But again, do not assume that doing this will
make any perceptible performance improvement. Unless you run demanding
graphic apps (many games fall into this category), it probably will not.

Not all upgrades result in real performance improvements, and in many cases
are just wastes of money. You can take the stock engine out of your Ford and
replace it it with some souped-up racing engine, but it won't make a bit of
difference if all you do is drive it on a road where you can never go faster
than 60 MPH.

For more advice, tell us more about what performance problems you are
experiencing, and how long you've had them. Also tell us what apps you run.
 
Thanks,

I have no problem running business or photo graphics software.

The underlying reason for improving my hardware is to run the latest MS
flight simulator (Flight Sim X). I am advised by its user group that it
needs a very high spec pc.

Thanks again

KK
 
KK said:
Thanks,

I have no problem running business or photo graphics software.

The underlying reason for improving my hardware is to run the latest
MS flight simulator (Flight Sim X). I am advised by its user group
that it needs a very high spec pc.


Most programs that need "a very high spec pc" don't necessarly need higher
specs for all hardware components. Some may be very demanding of the video
subsytem, others may need a lot of RAM, etc. I don't know anything about
this particular program and what it needs, but if I were in your shoes, the
first thing I would do before upgrading *anything* is to run the program and
see how it does on the hardware you already have.

*If* you are unhappy with its performance (and you may not be) then look
into where your performance issues are and find out *what* you need to
upgrade. I would then make upgrades one at a time and see if that made the
performance acceptable before adding another upgrade. Don't just blindly
upgrade everything.

Thanks again


You're welcome. Glad to help.
 
Back
Top