I posted a huge response, but I don't think it took for some reason, maybe I
responded to you Shane, but here's my response again, and I added some
stuff...
Shane Nokes said:
Halo2 on Integrated Intel Graphics?
If it even works (which 90% certain it won't, I'm a system builder) it
will give you around 3-5 Frames Per Second.
You need at least 30 frames per second to have any sort of smoothness to
the game at all.
I would honestly recommend getting at least the Radeon X1900, however I
doubt your current PC could handle the HD2900 due to the heave power
requirements.
Holy crap an x1900 for HALO 2?!
Whatever dude, if you need 60+ frames per second and you have $250 to spend
on a video card you certainly could do worse than a x1900, but if you just
want to play the game, what you have "WILL" work, and if it DOES NOT work,
it may not be the video card you're having problems with.
Just saying, it's not going to be a stellar experience, but it WILL run. I
have TF2, HalfLife2 and Halo 2 running on a notebook with a x1200 mobile
card. Like I said NOT STELLAR, but it works (Vista Ultimate).
I've been in game development (Mostly QA, management, etc.) on and off since
97, I got my start in support getting DOS games to run in Windows 95
enviornments, don't wave your "system builder" flag at me like I don't know
what I'm talking about. Now a days that's like saying you're a private in
the army. I'm not trying to say you don't know your shit, but I hope you
understand what I'm trying to say here.
If I didn't state my point of view clearly enough in my first post then I
apologize, but NOTHING gets my Internet Flame on then when people say you
need a really high end piece of hardware, when an "OK" piece of hardware
will do the job.
Lets break it down...
Great gaming experience:
ATi HD 2900 Dx10
nVidia 8800 GTX Dx10
ATi x1900 or x1950 Dx9
nVidia 7900 Dx9
Good Gaming:
nVidia 8600 Dx10
ATi HD 2600 Dx10
nVidia 7900 or 7800 Dx9
ATi x1700 or x1800 Dx9
OK Gaming:
nVidia 7600 Dx9
ATi x1600 or x1650 Dx9
Poor Gaming (But it'll work):
Just about any integrated chipset made in the last year.
nVidia 7300, ATi x1300
Some of the new Intel graphic chipsets are supposed to surpass similar stand
alone cards and cost hundreds less, so while they may not be uber, if you're
on a budget they won't kill ya.
--
ADDITIONAL.
BBPS.com just posted the official Epic recommended specs for UT3, thought
you might get a chuckle...
--snip--
Midway and (those guys Silicon Knights hate) Epic have revealed the PC
specifications for the upcoming first-person shooter, Unreal Tournament 3
and even typing the minimum requirements on my current box is experiencing
slowdown.
Minimum System Requirements
Windows XP SP2 or Windows Vista
2.0+ GHZ Single Core Processor
512 Mbytes of System RAM
NVIDIA 6200+ or ATI Radeon 9600+ Video Card
8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space
Recommended System Requirements
2.4+ GHZ Dual Core Processor
1 GBytes of System RAM
NVIDIA 7800GTX+ or ATI x1300+ Video Card
8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space
Okay, while they aren’t nearly as hefty as other upcoming titles (Sup,
Crysis?), the seemingly annual leaps of technology from one video card to
the next reminds me why most gamers have flocked toward the accessibility of
consoles rather than PCs.
--snip--
wow, min specs is a 5 year old video card from ATi, cpu requirements are up
there though.
ATi, as I've been told, designs all their graphic chipsets around DirectX
specs, and nVidia makes their own specs and uses drivers to adapt them for
DirectX. I remember early dev of certain games and we had to swap out nvidia
cards for ATi, just so the game would run. Odd.
512 ram in vista, wonder what that's gonna be like?
-A.