elziko said:
I have just bought a very cheap computer for a family member. It comes with
an Intel 82845G gaphics card built into the motherboard.
However, I have an old Voodoo 3 2000 AGP card lying around... is it worth
putting this in? Am I right in thinking that the Intel graphics controller
will use system RAM? It only has 256Mb.
Hi,
Yes, the in-built video controller is using your system RAM.
If you do graphics intensive stuff then your are probably losing a fair
chunk of your RAM to the video sub-system. Depending on which OS you are
running, 256MB might be a bit marginal anyway, so you don't want to lose
any.
I did a similar thing recently, i.e. got an older PC with integrated
graphics (Intel 815 chipset in my case).
I did some tests using Memtest86, running them with an AGP card
installed and without (i.e. using the in-built graphics controller), and
Memtest86 reported memory access as being 17% slower with the built-in
option.
Hence I am using a separate AGP card.
The card I am using is quite old so the cost isn't an issue as I could
probably only sell it for a pound or two anyway, so the performance
benefit seemed worth having. My machine is working as a server, so the
actual graphics performance is not an issue and so the old 4MB nVidia
card is fine.
So, it might be worth considering using a separate graphics card. I
don't know how the Voodoo card performs though, so that may or may not
be a good substitute.