You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Y
Yousuf Khan
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594
Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915
motherboards:
http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202
Yousuf Khan
Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915
motherboards:
http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202
Yousuf Khan
J
Judd
Alderwood is better anyway ;-)
Yousuf Khan said:http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594
Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915
motherboards:
http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202
Yousuf Khan
Y
Yousuf Khan
Judd said:Alderwood is better anyway ;-)
I think the 925 is also part of the recall.
Yousuf Khan
C
Carlo Razzeto
Yousuf Khan said:
To be totally fair it seems this is more of a manufacturing defect then a
"bug" ( assuming you define bug as a design flaw that got past QA ).
Carlo
T
Tony Hill
I think the 925 is also part of the recall.
Yup, it looks like it's actually the ICH6 part, ie the I/O chip or
"Southbridge" using the old terminology, not the memory controller
chip.
As another poster mentioned it was a manufacturing defect rather than
a design bug.