in message
I've used SpamPal for years, primarily with Outlook Express. It is
free, it works, but it isn't under development. The built-in
learning filters in Thunderbird or current versions of Outlook (2003
and newer) work better.
So what you are talking about for "learning filters" is Bayesian
filters. Yeah, I know Microsoft expends an entire paragraph of mumbo
jumbo trying to explain what is their spam filter but Microsoft is
doing is trying to hide that they finally also included a Bayes
filter. SpamPal has a Bayes plug-in, too.
It might not be the right product for someone not too computer
savvy, though.
Which is true of any security or spam software, or any other software
you install. If you are unwilling to learn how to use the product
then it was your choice to be lazy and your choice to waste disk
space. Anti-virus, intrusion protection/detection system software,
anti-spam, and all other security products are worthless if a user
simply answers Yes or Allow to every prompt or can't figure out how to
best configure the product to their needs. Putting a hammer in a
boobs hand who hasn't a clue about what a hammer is for won't get them
nailing together a house.