S
st1
Microsoft installers have consistantly asked for driver software, when
installing operating systems. Since 'Dos 3.0' this has consisted of a note
on the screen generally 'insert driver disk'. When a software is made
available ( through disk, search or directory ) the installer says 'not
found' or installs the driver.
If the installer knows what ii is looking for, why can't the *** thing let
us in on the secret. I also appreciate the 'unknown device' in device
manager.
OK, in Dos3.0 this was understandable, limited resources one or two
devices,...
Installing Vista, this is the result of sheer laziness The peripherals,
are self identifying, the drivers are 75% identification, and Vista knows
it's the wrong driver without Beginning to install it. But we still get the
Dos3.0 prompt 'guess which driver I'm looking for - and i'll tell you if
your wrong, Sorry no hints!!!'
Oh, sorry it's not laziness, Microsoft isn't using the P4, 512Meg, 80Gig,
and 128meg graphics, to process data, it's to display the 35 full-color
graphic desktops.
installing operating systems. Since 'Dos 3.0' this has consisted of a note
on the screen generally 'insert driver disk'. When a software is made
available ( through disk, search or directory ) the installer says 'not
found' or installs the driver.
If the installer knows what ii is looking for, why can't the *** thing let
us in on the secret. I also appreciate the 'unknown device' in device
manager.
OK, in Dos3.0 this was understandable, limited resources one or two
devices,...
Installing Vista, this is the result of sheer laziness The peripherals,
are self identifying, the drivers are 75% identification, and Vista knows
it's the wrong driver without Beginning to install it. But we still get the
Dos3.0 prompt 'guess which driver I'm looking for - and i'll tell you if
your wrong, Sorry no hints!!!'
Oh, sorry it's not laziness, Microsoft isn't using the P4, 512Meg, 80Gig,
and 128meg graphics, to process data, it's to display the 35 full-color
graphic desktops.