FREE SOURCES OF SOFTWARE SUPERIOR TO MICROSOFT, ETC.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Jai Maharaj
  • Start date Start date
D

Dr. Jai Maharaj

Forwarded message

Free Sources of Software Superior to Microsoft, etc.

Posted on 7/18/2006 by dangus

Free Software? Perhaps you've heard of the Open-Source
software movement, but thought maybe they were cheap,
college-student-written, "Brand X" knock-offs. Maybe you
presumed the only people who could use such programs wore
pocket protectors and broken bifocals. Or maybe you had
recent experience and found the installation too
confusing, with "targzs," incomprehensible "readme
files," etc.

The open-source movement has come of age, armed with
self-extracting files, crossplaform capabilities, and
extensive documentation. (That means you simply download
the program, and it installs itself; it works on any
operating system including, yes, Windows -- not just
UNIX -- and it teaches you how to use itself.)


The software is in many cases superior to the expensive
commercial versions:

Programs use up far less memory, drive space, and
processing power.

There are more features.

Documentation is simpler.

Error messages are meaningful.

They are less likely to cause problems interacting with
other products.

Here are some of the best:

OFFICE SOFTWARE: OPEN OFFICE

REPLACES MICROSOFT OFFICE, including WORD, EXCEL, ACCESS,
POWERPOINT and PUBLISHER.

Hands down, a superior product to Office. Take for
instance image editing in Writer, the equivalence to
Word: Simply click on the image, and you can set
contrast, brightness, gamma effects (washout vs.
overstain), tint/hue, etc.

The elements of OpenOffice work seemlessly together, and
have many more features. MS Office allows conversion of
its programs to HTML pages, but OpenOffice includes all
sorts of HTML features, such as dialog boxes, drop-down
boxes, etc. Because the programs are so much lighter,
they initialize much faster than MS Office, take less
drive space, and consume less memory and processor time;
and you switch from one component to the other nearly
instantly.

Truthfully, MS Office has loads of features many people
don't know about, because it doesn't present them to the
user. There are some weaknesses: the icons for the
various components look too similar, so they aren't great
for the Windows taskbar. The database program is fine for
most Access users, but lacks Access' ability to create
fully functioning executables.

Most impressively, you don't need to know how to learn
OpenOffice from scratch. Its menus, dropdown boxes, and
methods are the same as MS Office... except it has more
features. (Hey, don't feel bad for Microsoft; they ripped
off Lotus, Novell and Corel.) You can output to .doc,
xls, and .ppt formats, but also to additional formats,
such as .pdf.

GRAPHIC DESIGN: GIMP

REPLACES: PAINT SHOT, PHOTO SHOP, DRAW, etc.

Quite simply the best. Better than Draw. Better than any
of the Microsoft products. Better than PaintShop Pro.
I've been totally frustrated by having to switch graphics
design projects between programs, because each excels at
a given task. At each task, however, GIMP is as good or
better than any commercial program.


BROWSER: FIREFOX

REPLACES: INTERNET EXPLORER

The most famous freeware program of them all, Firefox is
literally the heir to the Mozilla program, which once
made Netscape dominant. Whereas Netscape has disappeared,
Firefox is rapidly gaining market share against Internet
Explorer. The only knock is that it has to be
initialized, taking a few seconds; Microsoft initializes
Explorer on startup, while you don't know why you're
waiting. Internet Explorer 7 is desperately trying to
catch up with Firefox, but it's clear who's leading the
way.

E-MAIL MANAGEMENT: THUNDERBIRD

REPLACES: OUTLOOK

Thunderbird simply does what you tell it. Tell it to shut
down, and it does, unlike Outlook which remains active,
so trojan viruses can continue using your computer as a
launchpad, infecting all your friends' computers, or
simply 1000s of random strangers'. Plus, Outlook is
simply a much larger target for virus developers
(although Thunderbird is so similar, it doesn't make as
huge as a difference as it might.) Junk mail processing
is simpler, as is accessing files from outside of
Thunderbird or Outlook. Apart from these issues, the
Outlook and Thunderbird are remarkable similar.

WEB DEVELOPMENT: NVU

REPLACES: DREAMWEAVER, FRONT PAGE

Dreamweaver is still the best. NVU falls short of
Dreamweaver 3.0, and the combined Adobe-Dreamweaver
merger may present awesome synergy, if done correctly.
But NVU is a professional Web-Development package which
is easy enough for beginners. Like Dreamweaver, it allows
for Templates, dynamic web sites, multiple graphic
packages, code snippets, extended internet languages
(i.e., XML, JavaScript), tabbing between coding and
WYSIWIG (graphic interface) design, and style sheets.
This IS the real deal.


As for Front Page, NVU is infinitely easier to use.

VIRUS PROTECTION: CLAMWIN

REPLACES: McAFFEE

The first to market seems quite satisfactory. Lacks
certain features, like anti-spam, but I hated the way
anti-spam add-ons work; I much prefer to let my e-mail
manager do the spam scan. There are certain other
products which are free for personal use, such as AVG,
and many ISPs offer built-in firewalls. (AVG is not free
for commercial use.

MEDIA PLAYER: AUDACITY

REPLACES: REALPLAYER, WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER

Realplayer is the world's most successful spyware/trojan
virus, infecting tens of millions of users, who haven't
realized its a highly trusted program which is grinding
their operating system to a halt. Many might be horrified
to learn what RealNetworks is learning about them.
Windows Media Player simply is very limited in use.
Neither allow for recording, like Audacity, which is a
full-bodied sound-editing system that is as light as the
useless MediaPlayer.

Posted on 7/18/2006 by dangus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
 
Forwarded message

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-To: dangus

Firefox is great, when it's not consuming memory and
taking 90% cpu time.

Posted on 7/18/2006 by MarkeyD
(The patriotism of the New York Times = The humanity
of an Islamic terrorist.)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
 
Forwarded message

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-To: MarkeyD

I've found that it usually doesn't take more than
Internet Explorer. Unfortunately, you don't have a choice
not to duplicate system resources; you're running IE
whether you want to or not. If you're finding your CPU is
being hogged, the problem is with the source, not the
messenger. ESPN.com's automatic streaming media content,
for instance kills my old laptop. Try adjusting your
settings to have control over what is running.

Another issue I've seen is certain viruses get embedded
so that they are reported like a function of your
browser.

Posted on 7/18/2006 by dangus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
 
Dr. Jai Maharaj said:
Forwarded message

Free Sources of Software Superior to Microsoft, etc.
VIRUS PROTECTION: CLAMWIN

Clamwin catches only a fraction of all viruses, and is not suitable for
use as a desktop AV defence. Thats not what its designed for and not
what it does.


NT
 
Clamwin catches only a fraction of all viruses, and is not suitable
for use as a desktop AV defence. Thats not what its designed for and
not what it does.


NT
Howdy NT;

Hope you don't mind that I've changed the subject header. I've
developed an aversion to certain doctors...

I just wanted to respond to your /second/ sentence. Clamwin is designed
for and does AV scanning*. Wrt to your first sentence...Yea, they've a
ways to go. In comparison w/other, finished products Clamwin lags in
detection but, to put this in perspective, this is a pre-v1.0 release.

I stopped recommending this AV for users who're looking for a finished
product. But for those who like living on the bleeding edge of F/OSS
development, Clamwin's a decent project.

fwiw,
-Craig

* (from clamwin.com)
 
Clamwin catches only a fraction of all viruses, and is not
suitable for use as a desktop AV defence. Thats not what its
designed for and not what it does.

I just wanted to respond to your /second/ sentence. Clamwin is
designed for and does AV scanning*.
[snip]

* (from clamwin.com)
ClamWin is a Free Antivirus for Microsoft Windows 98/Me/2000/XP
and 2003.

[snip some more]

But ClamAV, from which ClamWin takes the engine, isn't designed to be
part of a desktop AV solution.
<http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html> says, "The main purpose of this
software is the integration with mail servers (attachment scanning)."
IMO it's a good way for servers to cut down on some wasted bandwidth
and storage as well as partially protecting the clients they serve, but
I wouldn't recommend it to anybody trying to protect a desktop.
 
»Q« said:
Craig said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote:
Clamwin catches only a fraction of all viruses, and is not
suitable for use as a desktop AV defence. Thats not what its
designed for and not what it does.
I just wanted to respond to your /second/ sentence. Clamwin is
designed for and does AV scanning*.
[snip]

But ClamAV, from which ClamWin takes the engine, isn't designed to be
part of a desktop AV solution.
<http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html> says, "The main purpose of this
software is the integration with mail servers (attachment scanning)."
IMO it's a good way for servers to cut down on some wasted bandwidth
and storage as well as partially protecting the clients they serve, but
I wouldn't recommend it to anybody trying to protect a desktop.

Quite so. It does scan for viruses, but only some of them, and is of
little use as a desktop AV scanner. IIRC it only looks for somewhere in
the region of 1/3 of all viruses, and fails the basic 100% ITW virus
test - and any av scan that fails that is not much use as a desktop AV
solution.


NT
 
Forwarded message

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-To: MarkeyD

Did a little research: IE may be better at sharing
resources, or "backing down" at competing for
microprocessor time. If you are sure your computer is
virus free, try this:

Hit Ctrl-Alt-Delete to open your task manager.
Click on the processes tab.
Right-click on the Firefox browser.
Click on the "priority" tab.
Set the priority to lower.

When you have multiple applications competing for
processor time, this will make Firefox yield time to more
applications.

Posted on 7/18/2006 by dangus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
 
Back
Top