B
Bear
What one of the FREE AV products seems to be the best?
Thanks!
Thanks!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
D
David H. Lipman
The answer is subjective.
AVAST - http://www.avast.com/i_idt_1016.html - FREE
AVG - http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_dwnl_free.php - FREE
CA eTrust - http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/index.cfm - FREE for one year.
Dave
| What one of the FREE AV products seems to be the best?
|
| Thanks!
AVAST - http://www.avast.com/i_idt_1016.html - FREE
AVG - http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_dwnl_free.php - FREE
CA eTrust - http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/index.cfm - FREE for one year.
Dave
| What one of the FREE AV products seems to be the best?
|
| Thanks!
O
optikl
Bear said:What one of the FREE AV products seems to be the best?
Thanks!
AVAST seems to have a lot of satisfied users. I haven't tried the
product in over a year, although I have a recent copy d/loaded and a
registration number.
Try it and let us know your opinion.
B
Bart Bailey
In Message-ID:<[email protected]> posted on
Had that question been asked last month, I would have unhesitatingly
recommended f-prot. But it seems that with the latest iteration (3.14e)
their over-ambitious desires to scan within compressed archives has done
them in. If you can obtain a copy of v3.14b, it will accommodate the
latest defs, and perform flawlessly, for the time being. They don't
maintain an archive of previous versions (even the ones that work) on
their site.
Good Luck
What one of the FREE AV products seems to be the best?
Thanks!
Had that question been asked last month, I would have unhesitatingly
recommended f-prot. But it seems that with the latest iteration (3.14e)
their over-ambitious desires to scan within compressed archives has done
them in. If you can obtain a copy of v3.14b, it will accommodate the
latest defs, and perform flawlessly, for the time being. They don't
maintain an archive of previous versions (even the ones that work) on
their site.
Good Luck
B
Bear
optikl said:AVAST seems to have a lot of satisfied users. I haven't tried the
product in over a year, although I have a recent copy d/loaded and a
registration number.
Try it and let us know your opinion.
I will do so, thats for the reply.
Bear
B
Bear
optikl said:AVAST seems to have a lot of satisfied users. I haven't tried the
product in over a year, although I have a recent copy d/loaded and a
registration number.
Try it and let us know your opinion.
I will do so, thats for the reply.
Bear
B
Bear
Bart said:In Message-ID:<[email protected]> posted on
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:33:29 -0500, Bear wrote:
Had that question been asked last month, I would have unhesitatingly
recommended f-prot. But it seems that with the latest iteration (3.14e)
their over-ambitious desires to scan within compressed archives has done
them in. If you can obtain a copy of v3.14b, it will accommodate the
latest defs, and perform flawlessly, for the time being. They don't
maintain an archive of previous versions (even the ones that work) on
their site.
Good Luck
Thank you.