FP includes in Web Expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I read in another thread how to create an include (through a workaround
process) in Web Expressions. But how about the includes already built into my
current FP web sites? If I make the switch to Web Expressions, what happens
to my FP includes? And, if Web Expressions does, technically, accept my
includes without modification, will it handle the includes gracefully, or
will it be awkward and untenable? In other words, will I regret migrating to
Web Expressions?
 
Microsoft Expression will support existing FrontPage server extensions.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Ministry of Software Development
http://unclechutney.blogspot.com

I just flew in from Chicago with
a man with a wooden leg named Smith
who shot an elephant in my pajamas.
So I bit him.
 
I use FrontPage includes extensively in Expressions Web, and there are
no problems at all with new includes, or existing ones.
The only missing item from the right-click menu is Include Properties -
but double clicking (or ALT+Enter) the include brings up the properties
dialogue.

In my opinion, the Code snippet workaround is easier to use than the
FrontPAge insert dialogues, or a toolbar button in FrontPage.
 
I just read a post by wise Cheryl on the expression newsgroup that an
add-in is planned for Expression that will do the design-time
includes.
 
Includes do not require FP server extensions. ;-)

Not a run-time, but at design-time they do. :-)

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Ministry of Software Development
http://unclechutney.blogspot.com

I just flew in from Chicago with
a man with a wooden leg named Smith
who shot an elephant in my pajamas.
So I bit him.
 
I beg to differ. Includes do not require extensions at design-time. Been
doing it with disk-based webs for years.

Show me where it says otherwise.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281532
--
===
Tom Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
---
FrontPage Support:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
===
|> Includes do not require FP server extensions. ;-)
|
| Not a run-time, but at design-time they do. :-)
|
| --
| HTH,
|
| Kevin Spencer
| Microsoft MVP
| Ministry of Software Development
| http://unclechutney.blogspot.com
|
| I just flew in from Chicago with
| a man with a wooden leg named Smith
| who shot an elephant in my pajamas.
| So I bit him.
|
|
| | > Includes do not require FP server extensions. ;-)
| > --
| > Tom Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > FrontPage Support: http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| > ----------
| > | >> Microsoft Expression will support existing FrontPage server extensions.
| >>
| >> --
| >> HTH,
| >>
| >> Kevin Spencer
| >> Microsoft MVP
| >> Ministry of Software Development
| >> http://unclechutney.blogspot.com
| >>
| >> I just flew in from Chicago with
| >> a man with a wooden leg named Smith
| >> who shot an elephant in my pajamas.
| >> So I bit him.
| >>
| >>
| >> | >>>I read in another thread how to create an include (through a workaround
| >>> process) in Web Expressions. But how about the includes already built
| >>> into my
| >>> current FP web sites? If I make the switch to Web Expressions, what
| >>> happens
| >>> to my FP includes? And, if Web Expressions does, technically, accept
my
| >>> includes without modification, will it handle the includes gracefully,
| >>> or
| >>> will it be awkward and untenable? In other words, will I regret
| >>> migrating to
| >>> Web Expressions?
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
|
|
 
You are still using the design-time extension when working in a disk-based web.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
==============================================
Agents Real Estate Listing Network
http://www.NReal.com
==============================================
 
Even when extensions are not installed?

--
===
Tom Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
---
FrontPage Support:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
===
| You are still using the design-time extension when working in a disk-based
web.
|
| --
| ==============================================
| Thomas A. Rowe
| Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| ==============================================
| Agents Real Estate Listing Network
| http://www.NReal.com
| ==============================================
|
|
| | >I beg to differ. Includes do not require extensions at design-time.
Been
| > doing it with disk-based webs for years.
| >
| > Show me where it says otherwise.
| > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281532
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| > ===
| > | > |> Includes do not require FP server extensions. ;-)
| > |
| > | Not a run-time, but at design-time they do. :-)
| > |
| > | --
| > | HTH,
| > |
| > | Kevin Spencer
| > | Microsoft MVP
| > | Ministry of Software Development
| > | http://unclechutney.blogspot.com
| > |
| > | I just flew in from Chicago with
| > | a man with a wooden leg named Smith
| > | who shot an elephant in my pajamas.
| > | So I bit him.
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | > Includes do not require FP server extensions. ;-)
| > | > --
| > | > Tom Willett
| > | > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > | > FrontPage Support: http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| > | > ----------
| > | > | > | >> Microsoft Expression will support existing FrontPage server
extensions.
| > | >>
| > | >> --
| > | >> HTH,
| > | >>
| > | >> Kevin Spencer
| > | >> Microsoft MVP
| > | >> Ministry of Software Development
| > | >> http://unclechutney.blogspot.com
| > | >>
| > | >> I just flew in from Chicago with
| > | >> a man with a wooden leg named Smith
| > | >> who shot an elephant in my pajamas.
| > | >> So I bit him.
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >> | > | >>>I read in another thread how to create an include (through a
workaround
| > | >>> process) in Web Expressions. But how about the includes already
built
| > | >>> into my
| > | >>> current FP web sites? If I make the switch to Web Expressions,
what
| > | >>> happens
| > | >>> to my FP includes? And, if Web Expressions does, technically,
accept
| > my
| > | >>> includes without modification, will it handle the includes
gracefully,
| > | >>> or
| > | >>> will it be awkward and untenable? In other words, will I regret
| > | >>> migrating to
| > | >>> Web Expressions?
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
 
Yes. Open a disk-based web, then Tools | Web / Site Settings

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
==============================================
Agents Real Estate Listing Network
http://www.NReal.com
==============================================
 
Back
Top