L
Laurel
I have a form based on a SQL statement. The SQL statement retrieves two
tables. In the "Existing Fields" list, the names of fields from the first
table have no prefix, and the names of the fields from the second table have
this form.... tablename_field_name. I set it up some time ago and just
recently added fields from the second table. The new fields have to form
tablename.field_name. A dot between table and field instead of an
underscore. Why is this? Does it have ramifications?
(Note - I had a very difficult time adding the new fields. It would look
like they were added OK in the SQL statement, but when I returned to the
form they were not in the "Existing Fields" list, and when I returned to the
SQL statement they were not there. This was true even if I explicitly saved
the SQL statement before closing it. I think I solved the problem by
picking the table and then the field instead of other methods, like clicking
the field list and choosing from all the fields in both tables, or double
clicking on the field in the graphic at the top.)
tables. In the "Existing Fields" list, the names of fields from the first
table have no prefix, and the names of the fields from the second table have
this form.... tablename_field_name. I set it up some time ago and just
recently added fields from the second table. The new fields have to form
tablename.field_name. A dot between table and field instead of an
underscore. Why is this? Does it have ramifications?
(Note - I had a very difficult time adding the new fields. It would look
like they were added OK in the SQL statement, but when I returned to the
form they were not in the "Existing Fields" list, and when I returned to the
SQL statement they were not there. This was true even if I explicitly saved
the SQL statement before closing it. I think I solved the problem by
picking the table and then the field instead of other methods, like clicking
the field list and choosing from all the fields in both tables, or double
clicking on the field in the graphic at the top.)