What I did was join the two tables by using the Contract Number field. My
goal was to create a form that can read/write data to 3 different tables ,
where the appearance and functionality to the end user is the same as what we
have today: one form - one table. Since I need too many fields to fit in one
table, am I asking Access to do something it isn't capable of?
No; you are asking Access to adapt to an improper table design.
Access is a very powerful program - but using it incorrectly (with a
non-normalized table structure) can overload it and make it fail. If
you work WITH it rather than against it, you'll find that it's quite
capable of meeting your *real life needs*. I'd assert that designing
your table structure to fit a preconcieved form is a minor benefit,
but not a "need"; and that a logical, normalized structure using Forms
and Subforms will (after the first two hours of getting over the "it
doesn't work exactly the same as it used to") be simpler, more
logical, and better for the users.
Could you explain - as I've asked before - what all these scores of
fields are?
John W. Vinson[MVP]