G
Guest
I would really appreciate assistance with this one! I use Windows XP
Professional and Word 2002.
I have a four chapter document in which the footnotes are set to restart at
the end of each chapter via the insertion of a section break. This works
fine, but the problem comes with the insertion of a table mid way through one
chapter that needs to be in landscape orientation. Because I want landscape
to apply to this page alone, Word inserts a section break immediately above
and below it (thereby isolating this page). This plays havoc with footnotes
because it restarts them mid way through the chapter. Word will not allow me
to manually over-ride this without messing up the rest of the document: i.e.,
when I tell it to number the first footnote after the landscape page #7
(instead of #1), it automatically changes the whole thesis from "restart each
section" to "continuous". So Word will EITHER let me have "restart each
section" OR override the footnote numbering on this page, BUT NOT BOTH! This
seems to be a glitch in Word ... or am I missing something??
Richard.
Professional and Word 2002.
I have a four chapter document in which the footnotes are set to restart at
the end of each chapter via the insertion of a section break. This works
fine, but the problem comes with the insertion of a table mid way through one
chapter that needs to be in landscape orientation. Because I want landscape
to apply to this page alone, Word inserts a section break immediately above
and below it (thereby isolating this page). This plays havoc with footnotes
because it restarts them mid way through the chapter. Word will not allow me
to manually over-ride this without messing up the rest of the document: i.e.,
when I tell it to number the first footnote after the landscape page #7
(instead of #1), it automatically changes the whole thesis from "restart each
section" to "continuous". So Word will EITHER let me have "restart each
section" OR override the footnote numbering on this page, BUT NOT BOTH! This
seems to be a glitch in Word ... or am I missing something??
Richard.